AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turley, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turley, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turley, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilmore, J. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 58, 141-144, Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Resting metabolic rate measured after subjects spent the night at home vs at a clinic

KR Turley, PJ McBride and JH Wilmore
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, Austin.

This study determined the effect on resting metabolic rate (RMR) of subjects spending the night before measurement at home vs at a clinic. Ten subjects participated in six randomized RMR measurements; three measurements were made after subjects slept the evening before the measurements in their home (H1, H2, and H3) and three after they slept in a clinical setting (C1, C2, and C3). There were no significant differences (P < 0.05) in oxygen consumption (VO2, mL/min), RMR (kJ/min, kJ.kg body wt-1.h-1, or kJ.kg fat-free mass-1.h-1), or respiratory exchange ratio (RER) between any of the six RMR measurements, or between mean values for the three home trials (VO2 = 216 +/- 41 mL/min, RER = 0.80 +/- 0.04, heart rate = 51 +/- 3 beats/min, ventilation = 7.1 +/- 1.1 L/min) vs the three clinical trials (VO2 = 216 +/- 45 mL/min, RER = 0.80 +/- 0.04, heart rate = 52 +/- 5 beats/min, ventilation = 7.0 +/- 1.1 L/min). We conclude that under most circumstances it is not important that subjects spend the night before RMR assessment at the measurement facility. However, when basal metabolic rate is to be assessed, an overnight stay at the clinical facility would generally be necessary.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. C. Masse, J. E. Fulton, K. L. Watson, M. T. Mahar, M. C. Meyers, and W. W. Wong
Influence of body composition on physical activity validation studies using doubly labeled water
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2004; 96(4): 1357 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Smith, J. Dollman, R. T. Withers, M. Brinkman, J. P. Keeves, and D. G. Clark
Relationship between maximum aerobic power and resting metabolic rate in young adult women
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1997; 82(1): 156 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Nutrition