AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weststrate, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Amelsvoort, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weststrate, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Amelsvoort, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weststrate, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Amelsvoort, J. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 58, 180-186, Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Effects of the amylose content of breakfast and lunch on postprandial variables in male volunteers

JA Weststrate and JM van Amelsvoort
Unilever Research Laboratorium Vlaardingen, The Netherlands.

The impact of the amylose content of breakfast and lunch on postprandial variables was investigated in 22 normal-weight healthy males. Areas under the curve for insulin but not glucose were significantly smaller after the high-amylose breakfasts. Areas under the curve for both glucose and insulin were significantly smaller after the high-amylose lunches. Breath-hydrogen excretion over 14 h after breakfast indicated good digestibility of both types of meals. No systematic effect of amylose content on appetite or fullness ratings was observed. The amylose content of meals affects postprandial responses, but the effects are small and depend on meal size or composition.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
K. M. Behall, D. J. Scholfield, J. G. Hallfrisch, and H. G.M. Liljeberg-Elmstahl
Consumption of Both Resistant Starch and {beta}-Glucan Improves Postprandial Plasma Glucose and Insulin in Women
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 976 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Brighenti, L. Benini, D. Del Rio, C. Casiraghi, N. Pellegrini, F. Scazzina, D. J. Jenkins, and I. Vantini
Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates contributes to the second-meal effect.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 817 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
J. Hallfrisch and K. M. Behall
Mechanisms of the Effects of Grains on Insulin and Glucose Responses
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(90003): 320S - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Society for Nutrition