AJCN Yamada Bee Farm Grant for Honeybee Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buzzard, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sievert, Y. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buzzard, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sievert, Y. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buzzard, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sievert, Y. A.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 59, 275S-280S, Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

REVIEW ARTICLES

Research priorities and recommendations for dietary assessment methodology.First International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods

IM Buzzard and YA Sievert
Nutrition Coordinating Center, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015.

A list of research priorities related to dietary assessment methodology is presented. The priorities are based on a consensus of opinion by a multidisciplinary international group of experts who participated in the First International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods. These experts included researchers in dietary assessment methodology, major users of dietary assessment methods, and policymakers involved in setting food and nutrition policies. The list of priorities may be used as a guide for planning future research in dietary assessment methods, for prioritizing the allocation of available research resources, and for planning subsequent conferences. A list of recommendations related to dietary assessment methodology is also presented. Procedures used by the conference planners to select the experts are described, and the need for developing objective criteria for ranking priorities is discussed. An ongoing function of the conference series will be to continue the process of revising the priorities and recommendations to reflect progress made and newly identified needs in dietary assessment methodology.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Subar, F. E. Thompson, V. Kipnis, D. Midthune, P. Hurwitz, S. McNutt, A. McIntosh, and S. Rosenfeld
Comparative Validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires : The Eating at America's Table Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2001; 154(12): 1089 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Subar, D. Midthune, M. Kulldorff, C. C. Brown, F. E. Thompson, V. Kipnis, and A. Schatzkin
Evaluation of Alternative Approaches to Assign Nutrient Values to Food Groups in Food Frequency Questionnaires
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 152(3): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Nutrition