AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spaaij, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spaaij, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spaaij, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 59, 42-47, Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Effect of lactation on resting metabolic rate and on diet- and work- induced thermogenesis

CJ Spaaij, JM van Raaij, LC de Groot, LJ van der Heijden, HA Boekholt and JG Hautvast
Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

Energy metabolism was measured in 24 women before pregnancy and during lactation (2 mo postpartum). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) increased by 0.17 +/- 0.38 kJ/min and postprandial metabolic rate (PPMR) showed a similar increase (0.17 +/- 0.45 kJ/min). Thus, the thermic effect of the meal (PPMR minus RMR) was not affected by lactation. Between subjects, the lactation-induced increase in RMR appeared to be positively related to body weight. During lactation gross metabolic rates during cycling (CMR) were slightly reduced and net metabolic rates during cycling (CMR minus RMR) tended to decrease by 0.6 kJ/min at all workloads; however, the decrease was statistically significant only at the lowest workload. Changes in metabolic rate during the recovery period after exercise were not significant, but resembled changes in RMR rather than changes in CMR. We conclude that no major changes in metabolic efficiency occurred during lactation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. S. Johnson, S. C. Thomson, and J. R. Speakman
Limits to sustained energy intake: II. Inter-relationships between resting metabolic rate, life-history traits and morphology in MUS MUSCULUS
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2001; 204(11): 1937 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. F. Butte, W. W. Wong, and J. M. Hopkinson
Energy Requirements of Lactating Women Derived from Doubly Labeled Water and Milk Energy Output
J. Nutr., January 1, 2001; 131(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. F Butte, J. M Hopkinson, N. Mehta, J. K Moon, and E O'B. Smith
Adjustments in energy expenditure and substrate utilization during late pregnancy and lactation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 1999; 69(2): 299 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. F. Butte, L. Barbosa, S. Villalpando, W. W. Wong, and E. O. Smith
Total Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity Level of Lactating Mesoamerindians
J. Nutr., February 1, 1997; 127(2): 299 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Nutrition