AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Moser-Veillon, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Moser-Veillon, P. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dengel, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Moser-Veillon, P. B.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 59, 990-994, Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Magnesium homeostasis: conservation mechanism in lactating women consuming a controlled-magnesium diet

JL Dengel, AR Mangels and PB Moser-Veillon
Baltimore Veterans Administration, MD.

This study was undertaken to determine whether lactating women consuming a low-magnesium diet compensate for magnesium secreted into breast milk by decreasing urinary magnesium losses. Six lactating (L) women, six nonlactating (NL) women (75 +/- 5 and 61 +/- 5 d postpartum, respectively), and seven never-pregnant (NP) women were studied while consuming a constant magnesium intake of 8.97 +/- 0.01 mmol/d for 20 d. After a 5-d stabilization period on the controlled diet, 24-h urine and fecal samples were collected for the next 15 d. The L women excreted significantly less (P < 0.01) urinary magnesium (2.10 +/- 0.35 mmol/d) than the NP women (3.45 +/- 0.37 mmol/d). No significant differences were detected in mean apparent magnesium absorption among the three groups of women, because of large individual variations of fecal magnesium and small sample size. L women apparently compensated for magnesium losses in breast milk (1.04 +/- 0.06 mmol/d) by reducing urinary magnesium losses (1.38 mmol/d) when consuming 8.97 mmol Mg/d.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Prentice
Micronutrients and the Bone Mineral Content of the Mother, Fetus and Newborn
J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1693S - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
J. G. Dorea
Magnesium in Human Milk
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(2): 210 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Nutrition