AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selby, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selby, P. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Selby, P. L.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 60, 944-948, Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Calcium requirement--a reappraisal of the methods used in its determination and their application to patients with osteoporosis

PL Selby
University of Manchester, Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.

The accepted practice of calculating the dietary calcium requirement from the relationship between calcium balance and intake was recently criticized on mathematical grounds. To try to determine the appropriate calcium intake in patients with osteoporosis, I examined the relationships between calcium intake, output, and balance in a group of such patients. Calcium-balance studies were performed on 25 patients with untreated osteoporosis: intake (x +/- SEM) was 30.34 +/- 3.02 mmol/d, output was 30.59 +/- 2.69 mmol/d, and calcium balance was -0.25 +/- 0.64 mmol/d. There was a significant correlation between intake and both output and balance (r = 0.98, P < 0.001 and r = 0.61, P < 0.01, respectively). Intake and output became equal at 31.7 (95% CI 27.9, 35.5) mmol/d. This value is the same as that obtained when the conventional method of calculation is used. Furthermore, if random values for calcium output are assigned to the observed values of intake it can be demonstrated that the same values will always be obtained by both methods The only difference is that the calculation based on balance and intake results in a narrower confidence interval.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Society for Nutrition