AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piers, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piers, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Piers, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hautvast, J. G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 61, 296-302, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of a meal in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in well-nourished Indian women

LS Piers, SN Diggavi, J Rijskamp, JM van Raaij, PS Shetty and JG Hautvast
Department of Physiology, St John's Medical College, Bangalore, India.

The resting metabolic rate (RMR) and thermic effect of a standard test meal (TEM) were measured twice each during the follicular and luteal phases (confirmed by plasma concentrations of progesterone and estradiol) of a single menstrual cycle, and once during the follicular phase of the following menstrual cycle, by using indirect calorimetry, in 13 well-nourished Indian women. There was a significant increase in the TEM (P < 0.05) (6.72 +/- 1.57% vs 7.96 +/- 1.48% of the energy content of the test meal for follicular and luteal phases, respectively) of 18.5% during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle but no significant difference in the RMR or postmeal total energy output (PMTEO). Dietary energy and macronutrient intakes in all subjects in both phases of the menstrual cycle were also similar. The RMR and the PMTEO were also similar when measured in the follicular phase of consecutive menstrual cycles.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. J. Horton, E. K. Miller, and K. Bourret
No effect of menstrual cycle phase on glycerol or palmitate kinetics during 90 min of moderate exercise
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2006; 100(3): 917 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C L. Kien, J. Y Bunn, and F. Ugrasbul
Increasing dietary palmitic acid decreases fat oxidation and daily energy expenditure
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2005; 82(2): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. S. Day, W. S. Gozansky, R. E. Van Pelt, R. S. Schwartz, and W. M. Kohrt
Sex Hormone Suppression Reduces Resting Energy Expenditure and {beta}-Adrenergic Support of Resting Energy Expenditure
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3312 - 3317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. L Pelkman, M. Chow, R. A Heinbach, and B. J Rolls
Short-term effects of a progestational contraceptive drug on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight in young women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2001; 73(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. J. Horton, E. K. Miller, D. Glueck, and K. Tench
No effect of menstrual cycle phase on glucose kinetics and fuel oxidation during moderate-intensity exercise
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2002; 282(4): E752 - E762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Nutrition