AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beidleman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by De Souza, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beidleman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by De Souza, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beidleman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by De Souza, M. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 61, 303-311, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Energy balance in female distance runners

BA Beidleman, JL Puhl and MJ De Souza
Department of Physical Education, Springfield College, MA.

Metabolic efficiency was assessed in ovulatory eumenorrheic female distance runners and untrained control subjects of similar age, body weight, and fat-free mass (FFM). Energy intake (EI) was estimated from 3-d dietary records. Energy expenditure (EE) was determined during the same 3-d period from individual heart rate oxygen uptake (HR/VO2) curves during rest and exercise, 24-h HR records, and the thermic effect of meals. The runners and control subjects did not differ in resting metabolic rate statistically adjusted for FFM (kJ/min), the thermic effect of a test meal (kJ/3 h), the energy cost of submaximal physical activity, or EI. EE was higher (P = 0.01) in the runners. Reported EI was lower than EE in both the runners (P = 0.007) and control subjects, (P = 0.006), resulting in energy deficits of -4131 +/- 1185 kJ/d and -1652 +/- 456 kJ/d, respectively. These female runners did not exhibit an enhanced metabolic efficiency compared with the control subjects. It is possible that the energy deficit for both the runners and control subjects was due to both restricted eating and underreporting during the measurement period. Additional studies using longer measurement periods, more sophisticated technology (ie, doubly labeled water, more subjects, and subjects of varying menstrual and energy intake status) are needed to truly answer this question.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. E. Foster-Schubert, A. McTiernan, R. S. Frayo, R. S. Schwartz, K. B. Rajan, Y. Yasui, S. S. Tworoger, and D. E. Cummings
Human Plasma Ghrelin Levels Increase during a One-Year Exercise Program
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 820 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Nutrition