American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 61, 457-465, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

REVIEW ARTICLES

Systematic organization of body-composition methodology: an overview with emphasis on component-based methods

ZM Wang, S Heshka, RN Pierson Jr and SB Heymsfield
Obesity Research Center, St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.

The field of body-composition research currently lacks a systematic organization of methods used to quantitate components at the atomic, molecular, cellular, tissue-system, and whole-body levels of body composition. In this report we propose a classification system for body- composition methodology that proceeds in steps, beginning with division of methods into in vitro and in vivo categories, advances to organization by measurable quantity (property, component, or combined), and ends with grouping of methods by mathematical function (types I and II). Important characteristics of component-based methods are then developed, including a classification of component relationship types, the role of ratios and proportions in type II component-based methods, and the basis of simultaneous equations in multicomponent methods. This classification system, the first founded on a conceptual basis, explains similarities and differences between the many diverse methods, provides a framework for teaching body-composition methodology theories to students, and suggests future research opportunities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. J. Ellis Selected Body Composition Methods Can Be Used in Field Studies J. Nutr., May 1, 2001; 131(5): 1589S - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. A Bray, J. P DeLany, D. W Harsha, J. Volaufova, and C. C Champagne Evaluation of body fat in fatter and leaner 10-y-old African American and white children: the Baton Rouge Children's Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2001; 73(4): 687 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Mingrone, A. Bertuzzi, E. Capristo, A. V. Greco, M. Manco, A. Pietrobelli, S. Salinari, and S. B. Heymsfield Unreliable use of standard muscle hydration value in obesity Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2001; 280(2): E365 - E371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Shih, Z. Wang, M. Heo, W. Wang, and S. B. Heymsfield Lower limb skeletal muscle mass: development of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry prediction model J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1380 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Ellis Human Body Composition: In Vivo Methods Physiol Rev, April 1, 2000; 80(2): 649 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pietrobelli, Z. Wang, C. Formica, and S. B. Heymsfield Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: fat estimation errors due to variation in soft tissue hydration Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 1998; 274(5): E808 - E816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Heymsfield, C. Nunez, and A. Pietrobelli Bioimpedance Analysis: What Are the Next Steps? Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 1997; 12(5): 201 - 203. [PDF]