AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, A. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, A. G.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 61, 1146-1152, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Comparison of the heart rate-monitoring and factorial methods: assessment of energy expenditure in highland and coastal Ecuadoreans

WR Leonard, PT Katzmarzyk, MA Stephen and AG Ross
School of Human Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Accurate estimates of total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) are critical to studies of the nutritional adaptation of human populations. This study compared the standard factorial method with the recently developed flex-HR technique in a sample of 32 adults (16 males, 16 females) from rural, agricultural communities of highland and coastal Ecuador. Although energy expenditures obtained from the two methods were highly correlated (r = 0.759, P < 0.0001), the 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU factorial method significantly underestimated TDEE relative to the heart rate-monitoring technique (10.27 +/- 2.54 compared with 11.91 +/- 3.96 MJ/d, P < 0.001). The degree of underestimation was greater in males, who had higher energy expenditures. Similarly, underestimation was greater in the highland farmers, who were studied during a period of heavy agricultural work. The differences in energy expenditure estimates translated into a 10% difference in estimated energy adequacy. Additional research is needed to identify the potential sources of bias in the factorial method and to further develop other techniques for accurately estimating energy expenditure under field conditions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Nutrition