AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frantz, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frantz, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fomon, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Frantz, J. A.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 62, 358-363, Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

What is the safe protein-energy ratio for infant formulas?

SJ Fomon, EE Ziegler, SE Nelson and JA Frantz
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242-1083, USA.

Infants eat primarily to satisfy energy needs and the safe amount of protein in infant formulas (ie, the amount adequate for nearly all infants) is therefore expressed as the protein-energy ratio. We studied male infants aged 8-112 d fed milk-based formulas. One group (experimental group) was fed formulas that provided protein-energy ratios of 3.73 g/MJ (1.56 g/100 kcal) from 8 to 27 d of age, gradually decreasing to 2.99 g/MJ (1.25 g/100 kcal) from 84 to 111 d of age. Growth rates and serum albumin and urea nitrogen of these infants were compared with those of a concurrently studied control group and a previously studied large reference group. Gains in weight and concentrations of serum albumin of the three groups were not significantly different. Gains in length were significantly less for the experimental group than for the reference group. Serum urea nitrogen was significantly less in the experimental group than in the control group or reference group. We conclude that the protein-energy ratios of the experimental formula diet were below the safe level. Because the decrease in growth rate of the experimental group was rather small (demonstrable only in comparison with the large reference group), and because serum albumin of the experimental group increased with age as in normally nourished infants, we suspect that the safe protein-energy ratio of infant formulas lies closer to the ratios fed to the experimental group than to the ratio [approximately 5.0 g/MJ (2.1 g/100 kcal)] in currently marketed milk-based formulas.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
O. Hernell and B. Lonnerdal
Nutritional evaluation of protein hydrolysate formulas in healthy term infants: plasma amino acids, hematology, and trace elements
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2003; 78(2): 296 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Dupont
Protein requirements during the first year of life
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2003; 77 (6): 1544S - 1549S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. C. Metges
Does Dietary Protein in Early Life Affect the Development of Adiposity in Mammals?
J. Nutr., July 1, 2001; 131(7): 2062 - 2066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society for Nutrition