AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friel, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Longerich, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friel, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Longerich, H. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Friel, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Longerich, H. P.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 63, 342-347, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Zinc absorption in premature infants: comparison of two isotopic methods

JK Friel, WL Andrews, BS Simmons, LV Miller and HP Longerich
Department of Biochemistry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.John's, Canada.

The fractional absorption of an oral dose of zinc can be measured in adults when given simultaneously with an intravenous dose and subsequently measuring the ratio of the double isotopic enrichment of urine. To test this method in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) premature infants [n=5 females and 7 males, 1160 +/- 290 g (chi +/- SD) birth weight, 29 +/- 4 wk gestational age], an oral dose of either 300 or 1200 micrograms 68Zn.kg(-1).d(-1) was equilibrated with formula or human milk and administered simultaneously with either 50 or 100 micrograms 70Zn.kg(-1).d(-1) given intravenously 35 +/- 3 wk postconception. Urine and fecal samples were collected for 3-6 d and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Endogenous fecal zinc (EFZ) was determined from isotopic enrichment, whereas net absorption and retention were calculated by traditional methods. The mean fractional absorption calculated from urine was 0.22 +/- 0.09 and from feces it was 0.25 +/- 0.07. Zinc intake averaged 1821 +/- 330, fecal excretion 1637 +/- 419, and urinary excretion 67 +/- 30 micrograms.kg(-1).d(-1). EFZ averaged 390 +/- 270 micrograms.kg(-1).d(- 1) and ranged from 48 to 889 micrograms.kg(-1).d(-1). Net absorption was 220 +/- 316 micrograms.kg(-1).d(-1) and net retention was 131 +/- 334 micrograms.kg(-1).d(-1). True absorption was 373 +/- 161 micrograms.kg(-1).d(-1). Fecal collection is difficult, tedious, and often incomplete, and may be replaced by urine collection for the fractional absorption of zinc in groups of premature infants.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. H. Zlotkin, C. Schauer, S. O. Agyei, J. Wolfson, M. C. Tondeur, K. P. Asante, S. Newton, R. E. Serfass, and W. Sharieff
Demonstrating Zinc and Iron Bioavailability from Intrinsically Labeled Microencapsulated Ferrous Fumarate and Zinc Gluconate Sprinkles in Young Children
J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 920 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
K. Y. Patterson and C. Veillon
Stable Isotopes of Minerals as Metabolic Tracers in Human Nutrition Research
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2001; 226(4): 271 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. A Abrams
Using stable isotopes to assess mineral absorption and utilization by children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 1999; 70(6): 955 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. Budd, P. Lythgoe, R. A. R. McGill, A. M. Pollard, and B. Scaife
Zinc isotope fractionation in liquid brass (Cu-Zn) alloy: potential environmental and archaeological applications
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1999; 165(1): 147 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition