AJCN Yamada Bee Farm Grant for Honeybee Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wardlaw, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wardlaw, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wardlaw, G. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 63, 433S-436S, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


REVIEW ARTICLES

Putting body weight and osteoporosis into perspective

GM Wardlaw
Medical Dietetics Division, Ohio State Univesity, Columbus, 43210, USA.

Osteoporosis is characterized by a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). Women more than men are at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures, especially in the wrists, lumbar spine, and hips. Numerous diet and lifestyle factors, including body weight, influence BMD, and in turn, fracture risk. BMD in the total body, hip, lumbar spine, and radius is weakly to moderately correlated to body weight, fat mass, and lean body mass in adolescent, perimenopausal, and elderly women, possibly as the result of stress on the skeleton from the mechanical loading of body weight alone. In addition, greater lean body mass may be a cause. Other explanations include increased hormonal circulation in obese women and greater conversion of adrenal androgens to estrogens linked to greater mass of adipose tissue. Currently no value is agreed on for weight-to-height versus osteoporosis and related fracture risk, but some extra fat mass yielding a body mass index > 26-28 does confer limited protection, whereas a slender figure yielding a body mass index < 22-24 increases risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. S Riedt, Y. Schlussel, N. von Thun, H. Ambia-Sobhan, T. Stahl, M P. Field, R. M Sherrell, and S. A Shapses
Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 972 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition