AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Black, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Black, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Black, D. R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 63, 448S-451S, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


REVIEW ARTICLES

Healthy body weights: an alternative perspective

RP Abernathy and DR Black
Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1362, USA.

The primary purpose of this roundtable discussion of the American Health Foundation is to establish healthy weight standards for adults. In most large, long-term, well-designed studies, the lowest morbidity and mortality rates occurred in adults at weights that yielded BMIs (in kg/m2) between 19 and 25. Best body fat percentages averaged between 12% and 20% for men and 20% and 30% for women. However, statistical values are not applicable to everyone and their strict application may be counterproductive. We believe that most weight-associated health problems result from a cascade of events associated with abnormal blood concentrations of insulin, glucose, or lipids that occur when fat cells become full and insulin-insensitive, and lose their protective functions. Indexes associated with high risk in obese persons often return to normal with appropriate physical activities, dietary habits, and a small weight loss even when body weight and percentage body fat remain above recommended amounts. We believe that statistically derived standards for body weight and percentage body fat are appropriate for use as a screening test but should be downplayed as strict guidelines for all.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Stevens, Juhaeri, and J. Cai
Changes in Body Mass Index Prior to Baseline among Participants Who Are Ill or Who Die during the Early Years of Follow-up
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2001; 153(10): 946 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. H. Eckel
Obesity and Heart Disease : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3248 - 3250.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition