AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazarus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blyth, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lazarus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blyth, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lazarus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Blyth, F.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 63, 500-506, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Body mass index in screening for adiposity in children and adolescents: systematic evaluation using receiver operating characteristic curves

R Lazarus, L Baur, K Webb and F Blyth
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

Body mass index (BMI) has been recommended for use in adolescent screening programs to select subjects with excess body fat for appropriate interventions. No systematic evaluation of MBI in screening for high degrees of adiposity was available when these recommendations were formulated. The purpose of this paper was to evaluated the screening performance of BMI using appropriate epidemiologic methods. Percentage body fat (TBF%) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DXA) in a convenience sample of 230 (119 males, 111 females) health Australian volunteers aged 4-20 y inclusive. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were prepared for detecting TBF% at or beyond the 85th percentile, using BMI as the screening test. Screening performance was slightly better for girls than for boys, but the differences were not significant. Reasonable true-positive (0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.85) and low false-positive (0.05, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.09) rates were observed at the 85th percentile cutpoint for BMI. At the 95th percentile cutpoint for BMI, both true-positive (0.29, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.47) and false-positive (0.01, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.03) rates were lower. Screening for excess adiposity by using an appropriate percentile cutoff for BMI gives acceptable performance. ROC curves facilitate design of screening programs by allowing an explicit tradeoff between true-positive and false-positive rates. Although large sample sizes are required for precise estimates, the cutoff points that have been recommended appear to offer a reasonable compromise between true-and false-positive rates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
N. F. Krebs, J. H. Himes, D. Jacobson, T. A. Nicklas, P. Guilday, and D. Styne
Assessment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity
Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(Supplement_4): S193 - S228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M. Westwood, D. Fayter, S. Hartley, A. Rithalia, G. Butler, P. Glasziou, M. Bland, J. Nixon, L. Stirk, and M. Rudolf
Childhood obesity: should primary school children be routinely screened? A systematic review and discussion of the evidence
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 416 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
Y. Ohno, K. Hirai, S. Sakata, S. Shimizu, Y. Akai, K. Ogoshi, S. Sherchand, R. Gurung, J.B. Sherchand, and M.P. Shrestha
Nutritional Status of People Living in Dzong Village, in the Northern Mountainous Area of Nepal
Asia Pac J Public Health, September 1, 2006; 18(3): 20 - 29.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. G Neovius, Y. M Linne, B. S Barkeling, and S. O Rossner
Sensitivity and specificity of classification systems for fatness in adolescents
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2004; 80(3): 597 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
F.M. Moy and A.S. Atiya
Waist Circumference as a Screening Tool for Weight Management: Evaluation Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves for Malay Subjects
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 15(2): 99 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A R Dorosty, F Siassi, J J Reilly, R J Rona, and S Chinn
Obesity in Iranian children
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2002; 87(5): 388 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Horlick
Body Mass Index in Childhood-- Measuring a Moving Target
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2001; 86(9): 4059 - 4060.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. M. Maynard, W. Wisemandle, A. F. Roche, Wm. C. Chumlea, S. S. Guo, and R. M. Siervogel
Childhood Body Composition in Relation to Body Mass Index
Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 344 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. W Taylor, I. E Jones, S. M Williams, and A. Goulding
Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3-19 y
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 490 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. B Sardinha, S. B Going, P. J Teixeira, and T. G Lohman
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm girth for obesity screening in children and adolescents
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 1999; 70(6): 1090 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
H. Dean
Diagnostic Criteria for Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes in Youth (NIDDM-Y)
Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1998; 37(2): 67 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition