AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gougeon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gougeon, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gougeon, R.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 64, 78-86, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Thermic and metabolic responses to oral glucose in obese subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated with insulin or a very- low-energy diet

R Gougeon
McGill Nutrition and Food Science Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

Increased resting energy expenditure (REE) and a blunted thermic effect of glucose (TEF) have been reported in obese subjects with non-insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). I questioned whether the abnormal REE and TEF would be corrected by normalizing glycemia with insulin or a very-low-energy diet (VLED). Three male and four female obese subjects with NIDDM [weighing 108 +/- 6 kg and with body mass index (in kg/m2) of 39 +/- 2] received a weight-maintaing formula diet containing 95 g protein/d for 15 d then a 1.7-MJ, 93-g-protein VLED for 27 d. Insulin was given from days 1 to 8 in doses sufficient to normalize glycemia. REE was measured weekly and TEF was measured on days 8 and 15 of isoenergetic feeding and 28 d after the VLED by using a ventilated- hood indirect calorimeter. Weight decreased 9.8 +/- 1 kg during the VLED. REE was 3% lower with insulin treatment than during hyperglycemia (7878 +/- 364 compared with 8125 +/- 381 kJ/d, P = 0.002). REE decreased by 20% to 6494 +/- 280 kJ/d by week 4 of the VLED. After 112 g oral glucose, increments in energy expenditure were significantly greater during isoenergetic feeding with insulin than without (7.5 +/- 1.3% compared with 4.3 +/- 0.9% above REE) and after the VLED (10.5 +/- 1.0% above REE, P < 0.05). Plasma glucose excursions were greatest without exogenous insulin (peak 21.5 +/- 1.8 mmol/L at 120 min, 16.3 +/- 1.9 mmol/L at 225 min). Plasma fatty acid excursions were the lowest with insulin treatment. The integrated plasma glucose and fatty acid responses above baseline did not differ among studies; the integrated insulin and C-peptide responses were greater after the VLED. Cumulative nonoxidative glucose disposal (stored glucose) was higher with insulin therapy than without (52 +/- 6 compared with 35 +/- 7 g/210 min, P < 0.05) and increased significantly to 66 +/- 6 g after the VLED (compared with the isoenergetic diet without insulin). TEF correlated significantly with integrated C-peptide and insulin responses. The percentage increase in TEF with euglycemia (with insulin and VLED) correlated with the percentage increase in stored glucose (P < 0.05). The greater TEF was associated with a greater insulin response, which was probably responsible for the greater stored glucose.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition