AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heijnen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beynen, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heijnen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beynen, A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heijnen, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beynen, A. C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 64, 312-318, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Neither raw nor retrograded resistant starch lowers fasting serum cholesterol concentrations in healthy normolipidemic subjects

ML Heijnen, JM van Amelsvoort, P Deurenberg and AC Beynen
Department of Human Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands. marie-louise heijnen@etl.voed.wau.nl

The question addressed was whether dietary resistant starch would lower serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations in healthy normolipidemic subjects. In a randomized single-blind 3 x 3 Latin- square study with corrections for any carryover effects, 27 males and 30 females consumed supplements containing glucose or resistant starch (RS) from raw high-amylose cornstarch (RS2) or from retrograded high- amylose cornstarch (RS3). The RS2 and RS3 supplements provided 30 g RS/d. Each type of supplement was consumed in addition to the habitual diet for 3 wk. At the end of each 3-wk period, fasting blood samples and a 24-h food-consumption recall were obtained from each subject. The subjects collected 24-h urine samples for lithium determination, which was added to the supplements to check compliance. Mean lithium recovery was 97% and did not differ between supplements. The mean composition of the background diet was similar when the three supplements were taken. Body weight remained constant throughout the study. There were no significant differences in the fasting concentrations of serum total, high-density-lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; triacylglycerols, or 3 alpha-hydroxy bile acids after consumption of glucose, RS2, or RS3. Evidence is presented that the lack of effect of RS2 and RS3 on serum lipid concentrations cannot be explained by insufficient statistical power, a low dose, or a short duration of treatment. The subjects reported softer stools and more gastrointestinal symptoms after supplementation with RS than after glucose. Neither the RS2 nor the RS3 supplements lowered serum lipid concentrations in healthy, normolipidemic men and women.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. M. Langkilde, M. Champ, and H. Andersson
Effects of high-resistant-starch banana flour (RS2) on in vitro fermentation and the small-bowel excretion of energy, nutrients, and sterols: an ileostomy study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2002; 75(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. Kishida, H. Nogami, S. Himeno, and K. Ebihara
Heat Moisture Treatment of High Amylose Cornstarch Increases Its Resistant Starch Content but Not Its Physiologic Effects in Rats
J. Nutr., October 1, 2001; 131(10): 2716 - 2721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
D. J.A. Jenkins, V. Vuksan, C. W.C. Kendall, P. Wursch, R. Jeffcoat, S. Waring, C. C. Mehling, E. Vidgen, L. S.A. Augustin, and E. Wong
Physiological Effects of Resistant Starches on Fecal Bulk, Short Chain Fatty Acids, Blood Lipids and Glycemic Index
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 1998; 17(6): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition