AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, G.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, G.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tang, G.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, R. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 64, 622-626, Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Gastric acidity influences the blood response to a beta-carotene dose in humans

G Tang, C Serfaty-Lacrosniere, ME Camilo and RM Russell
Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111. TangvHP@HNRC.Tufts.edu

The effect of gastric acidity on the blood response to a single dose of 120 mg beta-carotene in humans was investigated in 12 normal subjects (5 women, 7 men) aged 23-68 y. Omeprazole was used for 7 d to obliterate gastric acid secretion and to raise gastric pH to > 4.5. In a crossover design, six subjects were randomly assigned to take beta- carotene with omeprazole either at the beginning (day 9) or at the end (day 26) of the study. The beta-carotene response in blood was not altered by the experimental order. Results from the high-gastric-pH phase (ie, with omeprazole) were analyzed together and compared with the results from the low-gastric-pH phase (ie, without omeprazole). The increases of serum concentrations of both trans beta-carotene and cis beta-carotene 6 and 24 h after the beta-carotene dose were significantly greater at a low gastric pH (pH = 1.3 +/- 0.1, ie, without omeprazole) than those at a high gastric pH (pH = 6.4 +/- 0.3, ie, with omeprazole), P < 0.02. Similarly, 24 h after beta-carotene administration, the area under the blood beta-carotene response curve (trans plus cis beta-carotene) was significantly greater at a low gastric pH (6825 +/- 760 nmol.h/L) than at a high gastric pH (3390 +/- 550 nmol.h/L), P < 0.002. In investigations of bacterial overgrowth, gelatin capsule disintegration and isomeric profiles associated with high and low pH, we could not identify factors to explain the differences observed in the blood response curves between low-gastric- pH and high-gastric-pH conditions. A suppressed blood response of beta- carotene at a high intraluminal pH may have been due to the slower movement of negatively charged micelles through the unstirred water layer and cell membrane.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. M. Russell
Factors in Aging that Effect the Bioavailability of Nutrients
J. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 131(4): 1359S - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
P. Borel, P. Grolier, N. Mekki, Y. Boirie, Y. Rochette, B. Le Roy, M. C. Alexandre-Gouabau, D. Lairon, and V. Azais-Braesco
Low and high responders to pharmacological doses of ß-carotene: proportion in the population, mechanisms involved and consequences on ß-carotene metabolism
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 1998; 39(11): 2250 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. Borel, V. Tyssandier, N. Mekki, P. Grolier, Y. Rochette,, M. C. Alexandre-Gouabau, D. Lairon, and V. Azaïs-Braesco
Chylomicron beta -Carotene and Retinyl Palmitate Responses Are Dramatically Diminished When Men Ingest beta -Carotene with Medium-Chain Rather than Long-Chain Triglycerides
J. Nutr., August 1, 1998; 128(8): 1361 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Society for Nutrition