AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Skweres, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Skweres, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Skweres, L.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 289S-304S, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Adherence to dietary recommendations in the special intervention group in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

L Van Horn, TA Dolecek, GA Grandits and L Skweres
Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.

This chapter presents findings on adherence to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial eating pattern by special intervention participants, on the basis of measures other than the 24-h dietary recall and blood cholesterol concentrations. These additional assessments included subjective ratings by a nutritionist, used during follow-up years 1 and 2, and a food record rating that was calculated from a 3-d food record, used during years 3-6. An additional tool used during the latter part of the trial was a checklist for evaluating degree of shortfall of the participant's diet from recommendations, level of motivation toward adherence, and factors in the social environment potentially influencing dietary behavior. Subjective ratings and food record ratings indicated that approximately 40-65% of participants were good or excellent adherers, with declines in these percentages over time. There were consistent strong relations between these ratings and change in serum cholesterol. Checklist evaluations gave similar overall findings, with about one-half to three-quarters of participants rated positively on infrequency of deviation from the eating pattern, motivation, and conducive environment. Several baseline traits predicted adherence. Adherence was better in older participants, in white than in black men, in nondrinkers, in those with fewer stressful life events, in those eating away from home less often, in less overweight men (although heavier participants exhibited greater changes in serum cholesterol, perhaps reflecting their poorer baseline diets), in those with higher serum cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure, and in nonsmokers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. L. Wanke, C. Daston, A. Slonim, P. S. Albert, K. Snyder, A. Schatzkin, and E. Lanza
Adherence to the Polyp Prevention Trial Dietary Intervention Is Associated with a Behavioral Pattern of Adherence to Nondietary Trial Requirements and General Health Recommendations
J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 391 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. M de Roos, J. H. de Vries, and M. B Katan
Serum lithium as a compliance marker for food and supplement intake
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2001; 73(1): 75 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition