AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eck, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Klesges, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eck, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Klesges, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eck, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Klesges, R. C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 419-424, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Differences in macronutrient selections in users and nonusers of an oral contraceptive

LH Eck, AG Bennett, BM Egan, JW Ray, CO Mitchell, MA Smith and RC Klesges
Universities Prevention Center, University of Memphis, TN 38152, USA. l.eck@mail.psyc.memphis.edu

One of the problems inherent in using women in clinical research is the effect that oral contraceptive (OC) use might have on physical indexes. Although weight gain is frequently reported as a side effect of OC use, there is little empirical evidence that such weight gain actually occurs. The current study investigated differences in energy balance [ie, dietary intake, resting energy expenditure (REE), and physical activity] between groups of users and nonusers of OCs. Each group completed a protocol that covered one menstrual cycle and consisted of daily recording of dietary intake, measurement of REE once during each phase of the menstrual cycle, and reporting of physical activity over the entire cycle. Comparisons indicate that there was a marginal interaction (P = 0.06) of OC use with total energy intake, indicating a different pattern of intake for the two groups. There were qualitative between-group differences such that the OC group consumed a greater percentage of energy as fat (P = 0.02) and a lesser percentage of energy as carbohydrate (P = 0.008). No group differences were found in the percentage of energy consumed as protein, but both groups consumed significantly less protein during menses (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in REE. Both groups of women reported marginally more activity (P = 0.09) during menses than during the luteal phase.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. L. Spadano, L. G. Bandini, A. Must, G. E. Dallal, and W. H. Dietz
Does menarche mark a period of elevated resting metabolic rate?
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2004; 286(3): E456 - E462.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. Seibert, E. Barbouche, J. Fagan, E. Myint, T. Wetterneck, and M. Wittemyer
Prescribing Oral Contraceptives for Women Older Than 35 Years of Age
Ann Intern Med, January 7, 2003; 138(1): 54 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. L Pelkman, M. Chow, R. A Heinbach, and B. J Rolls
Short-term effects of a progestational contraceptive drug on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight in young women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2001; 73(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition