AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byers, T.
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byers, T.
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Byers, T.
Right arrow Articles by McPherson, R. S.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 1210S-1214S, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


REVIEW ARTICLES

Dietary surveillance for states and communities

T Byers, M Serdula, S Kuester, J Mendlein, C Ballew and RS McPherson
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA. tim.byers@uchsc.edu

Information about dietary behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge is important for state and local health agencies because national monitoring lacks the local representativeness and timeliness necessary to catalyze community interest and to design, target, and evaluate dietary intervention programs. Currently, however, both methods and resources are limited for surveying diet in the population of a state or community. Brief assessments are included in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System for adolescents, which is conducted by state departments of education, and in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults, which is operated by state departments of health. More quantitatively precise measurements are being made by a few states and communities but personnel and financial resources for such surveys are limited. Nutritionists in state and local health agencies should explore the possibility of developing public-private partnerships with food producers, retailers, and marketers to collect information about dietary determinants and behaviors in states and communities. Better standardization of dietary assessment methods is needed, as is development of better methods to identify attitudes about diet and barriers to dietary improvement. Most important, though, dietary surveillance in states and communities must be more strongly tied to intervention programs intended to improve nutrition in those populations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. M. Krebs-Smith and L. S. Kantor
Choose a Variety of Fruits and Vegetables Daily: Understanding the Complexities
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 487S - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. R. Kristal, N. C. Vizenor, R. E. Patterson, M. L. Neuhouser, A. L. Shattuck, and D. McLerran
Precision and Bias of Food Frequency-based Measures of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 939 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition