American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 1502-1506, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Tolerance to the daily ingestion of two cups of milk by individuals claiming lactose intolerance

FL Suarez, D Savaiano, P Arbisi and MD Levitt
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.

We reported previously that consumption of one cup of milk (240 mL) per day produced negligible symptoms in lactase-nonpersistent (LNP) individuals self-described as being severely lactose intolerant. We hypothesized that such LNP individuals could also tolerate two cups of milk per day if taken in two widely divided doses with food, and that psychologic factors play a role in perceptions of lactose intolerance. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) was administered to 19 LNP subjects self-described as markedly lactose intolerant (S-LNP), 13 LNP subjects who denied lactose intolerance (A- LNP), and 10 lactase-persistent individuals who believed they were lactose intolerant (S-LP). Symptoms were recorded when LNP subjects ingested 240 mL regular or lactose-hydrolyzed milk twice daily for 7 d in a double-blind crossover study. The results showed that neither LNP group had a significant increase in symptoms (P < 0.05) during the regular compared with the lactose-hydrolyzed milk periods. However, S- LNP subjects reported significantly greater gaseous symptoms than did the A-LNP subjects during both treatment periods. The MMPI-2 showed a high score on the "lie" validity scale for S-LNP subjects. We conclude that LNP subjects tolerate two cups of milk per day without appreciable symptoms. S-LNP subjects have underlying flatulence that is misattributed to lactose intolerance. MMPI-2 results were of questionable validity because of the high rate of dissimulation by LNP subjects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Heyman and for the Committee on Nutrition Lactose Intolerance in Infants, Children, and Adolescents Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 1279 - 1286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Savaiano, C. J. Boushey, and G. P. McCabe Lactose Intolerance Symptoms Assessed by Meta-Analysis: A Grain of Truth That Leads to Exaggeration J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Byers and D. A. Savaiano The Myth of Increased Lactose Intolerance in African-Americans J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 24(suppl_6): 569S - 573S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S B Matthews, J P Waud, A G Roberts, and A K Campbell Systemic lactose intolerance: a new perspective on an old problem Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2005; 81(953): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Y. Lovelace and S. I. Barr Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Calcium Intakes of Individuals with Self-Reported Lactose Intolerance J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2005; 24(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Goldberg, S. C. Folta, and A. Must Milk: Can a "Good" Food Be So Bad? Pediatrics, October 1, 2002; 110(4): 826 - 832. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Miller, J. K. Jarvis, and L. D. McBean The Importance of Meeting Calcium Needs with Foods J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 20(2): 168S - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Vesa, P. Marteau, and R. Korpela Lactose Intolerance J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 165S - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. D Barnard, M. D Levitt, and F. L Suarez Study design of an investigation of lactose maldigestion Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69(6): 1289a - 1291. [Full Text]

				U. Teuri, H. Vapaatalo, and R. Korpela Fructooligosaccharides and lactulose cause more symptoms in lactose maldigesters and subjects with pseudohypolactasia than in control lactose digesters Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 1999; 69(5): 973 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. SUAREZ and M. LEVITT Assessing food intolerance: don't lose control Gut, November 1, 1997; 41(5): 715 - 716. [Full Text] [PDF]