AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatenby, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mela, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gatenby, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mela, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gatenby, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mela, D. J.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 1867-1873, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Extended use of foods modified in fat and sugar content: nutritional implications in a free-living female population

SJ Gatenby, JI Aaron, VA Jack and DJ Mela
Consumer Sciences Department, Institute of Food Research, Reading, United Kingdom.

The nutritional implications of the consumption of reduced-fat and reduced-sugar foods were assessed in nonobese, free-living female consumers in a 10-wk intervention trial. Subjects in control (C; n = 13), reduced-fat (RF; n = 17), and reduced-sugar (RS; n = 19) groups, all initially nonusers of reduced-fat and reduced-sugar products, kept 4-d food-intake records to establish energy and macronutrient intakes at baseline and at 2,4,7, and 10 wk. Groups RF and RS were instructed to use reduced-fat and reduced-sugar foods, respectively, ad libitum in place of habitually consumed foods with traditional composition, whereas group C was to maintain their usual diet. All foods were purchased by subjects in normal retail outlets and consumed at home. Analyses revealed no main or interactive effect of group on reported energy intake. RF subjects reduced their reported fat intake during the study (P = 0.017) compared with RS and C subjects, and RS subjects reduced their reported sucrose intake compared with RF and C subjects (P = 0.049). Group differences in total sugar intake were not significantly different. All groups reported a small but significant increase in reported protein intake during the study, whereas there were no significant effects on percentage energy from total carbohydrate. Body weights did not change significantly in any group over the study period. These results indicate that, as a single dietary strategy, casual use of macronutrient-substituted foods by consumers under normal eating conditions can significantly influence the macronutrient composition of the diet, but has little net effect on total energy intake or body weight status.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. B. Roberts, M. A. McCrory, and E. Saltzman
The Influence of Dietary Composition on Energy Intake and Body Weight
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2002; 21(2): 140S - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
W. O. Song and J. M. Kerver
Nutritional Contribution of Eggs to American Diets
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 19(90005): 556S - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. O. Hill, E. L. Melanson, and H. T. Wyatt
Dietary Fat Intake and Regulation of Energy Balance: Implications for Obesity
J. Nutr., February 1, 2000; 130(2): 284 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition