AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakx, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by van Weel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakx, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by van Weel, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bakx, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by van Weel, C.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 65, 1946S-1950S, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Long-term effect of nutritional counseling: a study in family medicine

JC Bakx, A Stafleu, WA van Staveren, HJ van den Hoogen and C van Weel
Department of Family and Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands.

This paper reports research using data in the Nijmegen Family Practice Monitoring Project. One part of the research is follow-up, after 17 y, of a 1977 trial of dietary advice for patients with hypertension or a family history of premature cardiovascular disease. In the intervention group, 840 patients were given health education every 2 mo by trained practice nurses for 1 y. There were 497 patients with similar coronary risk factors in the control group, who received usual care. One year after the intervention a significant decrease was found (and published) in serum cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure in the intervention group. By the time of the 1995 reexaminations, however, there were no differences in coronary risk factors between the two groups. Blood pressures had come down, more so in the control group, and the percentage of smokers had decreased equally in both groups. There were no significant differences in intake of dietary fat or in type of fat. The lack of difference was still found when the groups were divided into those with serum cholesterol concentrations > and < 6.5 mmol/L. A second part of the research was to investigate in 1995 the relation between patients' stage of change of fat intake and their dietary intake. It was found that those in stage 5 (sustaining desired changes in behavior) had the lowest saturated fat intake. Since 1977 both groups have been treated equally if hypertension was diagnosed. The two groups were not managed differently with regard to dietary advice after 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition