AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. M.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 66, 2-7, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Prediction of percentage body fat from anthropometric measurements: comparison of New Zealand European and Polynesian young women

EC Rush, LD Plank, MS Laulu and SM Robinson
Department of Applied Science, Auckland Institute of Technology, New Zealand. elaine.rush@ait.ac.nz

The prediction of total body fat from simple anthropometric measurements was examined in 42 white (New Zealand European and 40 Polynesian women aged 18-27 y. Percentage body fat (%BF) was determined from measurements of total body water (TBW) by 18O dilution. Mean (+/- SD) body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) averaged 29.2 +/- 7.9 (range: 16.5- 48.0) for the New Zealand European group and 31.2 +/- 7.9 (range: 19.8- 51.8) for the Polynesian group, %BF calculated from TBW was similar in the two groups (40.5 +/- 9.9% for the New Zealand European compared with 39.1 +/- 7.5% for the Polynesian group). BMI was significantly correlated with height in the Polynesian group but not in the New Zealand European group. The relation between BMI and %BF was curvilinear for both groups. At a fixed %BF, BMI was higher in the Polynesian group than in the New Zealand European group. A BMI of 30 for the New Zealand European group corresponded to a BMI of 34 for the Polynesian group at an equivalent %BF (42%). Prediction equations for %BF developed from skinfold thicknesses or girth measurements were ethnicity dependent. We conclude that the BMI criterion for obesity in whites requires revision for use in Polynesians.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. C Rush, L. D Plank, and W A. Coward
Energy expenditure of young Polynesian and European women in New Zealand and relations to body composition
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 1999; 69(1): 43 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Nutrition