American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 66, 223-231, Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Fitness, fatness, and the effect of training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and skinfold-thickness measurements in healthy adolescent females

A Eliakim, GS Burke and DM Cooper
Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance. aeliaki@ccmckids.org

The relation between fitness and adiposity is particularly relevant to adolescent females in whom fitness is known to decrease and fatness to increase. However, little is known about the interaction of these variables in normally active, nonobese subjects. Our major hypotheses were that adiposity would be inversely correlated with physical fitness and that even a relatively brief intervention would lead to measurable, site-specific changes in body fat. We used a cross-sectional protocol to correlate body adiposity with indexes of fitness and a prospective study design to examine body adiposity before and after a 5-wk period of endurance training in 44 nonobese females aged 15-17 y (control group, n = 22; training group, n = 22). Adiposity was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and thigh as well as by standard skinfold-thickness measuring techniques. Fitness was assessed by using cycle ergometer measurements of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). There were significant negative correlations between VO2max normalized to body weight and subcutaneous abdominal, thigh, and skinfold estimates of fat. However, when VO2 max was normalized to muscle volume these correlations were not significant. Abdominal fat increased in direct proportion to body weight (scaling factor = 1.14 +/- 0.16) but thigh fat increased proportionately less (scaling factor = 0.38 +/- 0.12, P < 0.05). Training increased thigh muscle mass significantly only in the midmuscle region and prevented the observed fat increase in the distal thigh of the control subjects. Body fat distribution in adolescent females appeared to be affected by many factors, including overall body weight and the level of physical activity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S D Allen, V Gada, and D M Blunt Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 242 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Thomas Obesity prevention programs for children and youth: why are their results so modest? Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2006; 21(6): 783 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Franz So Many Nutrition Recommendations--Contradictory or Compatible? Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2003; 16(1): 56 - 63. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Eliakim, T. P. Scheett, R. Newcomb, S. Mohan, and D. M. Cooper Fitness, Training, and the Growth Hormone{->}Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Axis in Prepubertal Girls J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2797 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]