|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 67, 74-80, Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
JA Coss-Bu, LS Jefferson, D Walding, Y David, EO Smith and WJ Klish
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
The use of prediction equations has been recommended for calculating energy expenditure. We evaluated two equations that predict energy expenditure, each of which were corrected for two different stress factors, and compared the values obtained with those calculated by indirect calorimetry. The subjects were 55 critically ill children on mechanical ventilation. Basal metabolic rates were calculated with the Harris-Benedict and Talbot methods. Measured resting energy expenditure was 4.72 +/- 2.53 MJ/d. The average difference between measured resting energy expenditure and the Harris-Benedict prediction with a stress factor of 1.5 was -0.98 MJ/d, with an SD delta of 1.56 MJ/d and limits of agreement from -4.12 to 2.15; for a stress factor of 1.3 the average difference was -0.22 MJ/d, with an SD delta of 1.57 MJ/d and limits of agreement from -3.37 to 2.93. The average difference between measured resting energy expenditure and the Talbot prediction with a stress factor of 1.5 was -0.23 MJ/d, with an SD delta of 1.36 MJ/d and limits of agreement from -2.95 to 2.48; for a stress factor of 1.3, it was 0.42 MJ/d, with an SD delta of 1.24 MJ/d and limits of agreement from - 2.04 to 2.92. These limits of agreement indicate large differences in energy expenditure between the measured value and the prediction estimated for some patients. Therefore, neither the Harris-Benedict nor the Talbot method will predict resting energy expenditure with acceptable precision for clinical use. Indirect calorimetry appears to be the only useful way of determining resting energy expenditure in these patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Mehta, L. J. Bechard, K. Leavitt, and C. Duggan Cumulative Energy Imbalance in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Role of Targeted Indirect Calorimetry JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 336 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sy, A. Gourishankar, W. E Gordon, D. Griffin, D. Zurakowski, R. M Roth, J. Coss-Bu, L. Jefferson, W. Heird, and L. Castillo Bicarbonate kinetics and predicted energy expenditure in critically ill children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zijlstra, S. M. t. Dam, P. J. M. Hulshof, C. Ram, G. Hiemstra, and N. M. de Roos 24-Hour Indirect Calorimetry in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C L. Kien and F. Ugrasbul Prediction of daily energy expenditure during a feeding trial using measurements of resting energy expenditure, fat-free mass, or Harris-Benedict equations Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2004; 80(4): 876 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Coss-Bu, D. L. Walding, Y. B. David, and L. S. Jefferson Dead Space Ventilation in Critically Ill Children With Lung Injury Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 2050 - 2056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Coss-Bu, W. J Klish, D. Walding, F. Stein, E O'B. Smith, and L. S Jefferson Energy metabolism, nitrogen balance, and substrate utilization in critically ill children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2001; 74(5): 664 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Schloerb Electronic Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2000; 24(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. White, R. W. Shepherd, and J. A. McEniery Energy Expenditure Measurements in Ventilated Critically III Children: Within- and Between-Day Variability JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, September 1, 1999; 23(5): 300 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |