AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 67, 934-939, Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Improving power with repeated measures: diet and serum lipids

JA Marshall, S Scarbro, SM Shetterly and RH Jones
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80262, USA. Julie.Marshall@uchsc.edu

The inability to detect associations between diet and serum cholesterol in cross-sectional population studies has been attributed to measurement error in diet assessments and between-subject variability in lipid concentrations. Current statistical methods can reduce the effects of measurement error and allow within-subject comparisons when replicate measures on individuals are available, even if the time between replicates is as long as 4 y and replicate data are not available for all subjects. Data from 928 nondiabetic participants of the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study with measures of 24-h dietary intake and fasting lipid concentrations at baseline, at a 4-y follow-up visit, or both were analyzed in a random-effects model that allowed for an unbalanced design. Sex was included as a non-time-varying covariate and age, body mass index, and energy intake were included as time-varying covariates. The findings when LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) was regressed on saturated fat intake (20 g/d) with all observations in a random-effects model (beta = 0.14, P = 0.0016) were compared with results with observations restricted to the first visit only (beta = 0.05, P = 0.52), a balanced design using averages across visits (beta = -0.12, P = 0.28), and a balanced design with random effects obtained by excluding subjects without two observations (beta = 0.12, P = 0.0092). Study power was greatest in the random-effects model using all observations and time-varying covariates. These findings highlight the importance of even a single replicate observation on a subsample of subjects. We recommend analyzing all data rather than averaging measures across visits or omitting observations to create a balanced design.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. Li, M. S. Johnson, and M. I. Goran
Effects of Low Birth Weight on Insulin Resistance Syndrome in Caucasian and African-American Children
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2001; 24(12): 2035 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Bhargava, J. A Marshall, and R. H Jones
Improving power with repeated measures
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 1999; 69(2): 338 - 339.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. D. Skinner, B. R. Carruth, J. Moran III, K. Houck, and F. Coletta
Fruit Juice Intake Is Not Related to Children's Growth
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Nutrition