|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 68, 656-661, Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
A Winkvist, JP Habicht and KM Rasmussen
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Umea University, Sweden. anna.winkvist@epiph.umu.se
To evaluate the effect of a nutritional supplement on change in women's weight during a reproductive cycle and on the difference in birth weight between one infant and the previous one, we analyzed data on 176 complete reproductive cycles from an experiment that was conducted in rural Guatemala. Women with an initial weight <50 kg were classified as marginally nourished or malnourished. Women whose intake of the supplement was in the top 2 tertiles were distinguished from those whose intake was in the lowest tertile. Linear regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of supplementation on these outcomes and to control for confounding factors. Malnourished women gained weight during the reproductive cycle, but their second (study) infant tended to weigh less at birth than their prior-born infant. Higher intakes of supplement were associated with a less negative difference in birth weight. Marginally nourished women lost weight during the reproductive cycle and their second (study) infant tended to weigh more at birth than their prior-born infant. Higher intakes of supplement were associated with a less negative difference in birth weight trend for the women themselves. Well-nourished women and their infants did not show any of these benefits from supplementation. These findings help explain past contradictory findings on maternal depletion as well as on the benefits of nutritional supplementation for mothers and their infants.
Related articles in AJCN:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Shaheen, A. de Francisco, S. El Arifeen, E.-C. Ekstrom, and L. A. Persson Effect of prenatal food supplementation on birth weight: an observational study from Bangladesh Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): 1355 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A Leon Biological theories, evidence, and epidemiology Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2004; 33(6): 1167 - 1171. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. King The Risk of Maternal Nutritional Depletion and Poor Outcomes Increases in Early or Closely Spaced Pregnancies J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1732S - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C Konje and O. A Ladipo Nutrition and obstructed labor Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2000; 72(1): 291S - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. K. KOO, J. C. WALTERS, J. ESTERLITZ, R. J. LEVINE, A. J. BUSH, and B. SIBAI Maternal Calcium Supplementation and Fetal Bone Mineralization Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 1999; 94(4): 577 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |