AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol 68, 939S-943S, Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc


REVIEW ARTICLES

Energy requirements for growth and development in infancy

PS Davies
School of Human Movement Studies, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. ps.davies@qut.edu.au

Current international recommendations for energy requirements are based on >9000 measurements of energy intake in both breast- and formula-fed infants. The measurement of energy intake in babies is far from straightforward and the possibility of significant error is great. The opportunity now exists, however, to compare current recommendations with measurements of total energy expenditure (TEE) obtained via the doubly labeled water technique. Approximately 300 measurements of TEE in the first year of life have been made in normal, healthy babies. These data show that estimates of energy intake derived from the measurements of TEE are considerably below the current international recommendations. The same technique has also allowed the energy requirements of sick infants to be evaluated. Two examples are highlighted of infants born small for gestational age and infants born with cystic fibrosis. First, data collected from babies born small for gestational age suggest that such infants have a TEE and hence requirement approximately 20% above that found in infants born with a weight appropriate for their gestational age. This information will be relevant to those professionals attempting to supply optimum nutrition to babies born small for gestational age. Second, in cystic fibrosis it has been suggested that, concurrent with the basic features of the disease, there is an energy-wasting lesion that will increase TEE and hence energy requirement. Recent data collected from babies with cystic fibrosis strongly suggest that this is not the case, and previous data were confounded by subclinical disease status.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
O A F Bodamer and D Halliday
Uses of stable isotopes in clinical diagnosis and research in the paediatric population
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2001; 84(5): 444 - 448.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. A. Schoeller
Recent Advances from Application of Doubly Labeled Water to Measurement of Human Energy Expenditure
J. Nutr., October 1, 1999; 129(10): 1765 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Nutrition