AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C
Right arrow Articles by Coward, W A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C
Right arrow Articles by Coward, W A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rush, E. C
Right arrow Articles by Coward, W A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 1, 43-48, January 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Energy expenditure of young Polynesian and European women in New Zealand and relations to body composition1,2,3

Elaine C Rush, Lindsay D Plank and W Andrew Coward

Background: Reduced energy expenditure and excessive energy intake have been hypothesized to cause obesity. New Zealanders of Polynesian origin have a higher prevalence of obesity than do those of European origin.

Objective: We investigated relations between components of energy expenditure and body composition.

Design: We measured total energy expenditure (TEE) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) in 80 young women [40 New Zealand (NZ) Polynesian and 40 NZ European] aged 18–27 y by the doubly labeled water method and indirect calorimetry, respectively. Each group was partitioned into nonobese and obese on the basis of percentage body fat.

Results: TEE and body weight were highly correlated in nonobese NZ Europeans (n = 23, r = 0.76, P < 0.001), obese NZ Europeans (r = 0.58, P = 0.016), and nonobese NZ Polynesians (n = 25, r = 0.59, P = 0.002) but not in obese NZ Polynesians (r = 0.11, P = 0.70). Activity energy expenditure (AEE = TEE - RMR) was similar in obese Polynesians and Europeans (x ± SD: 5.5 ± 2.2 and 5.2 ± 1.9 MJ/d, respectively), but significantly higher in nonobese Polynesians (5.7 ± 2.5 MJ/d) than in their European counterparts (3.8 ± 1.9 MJ/d, P = 0.005). Similar trends were seen when AEE adjusted for body weight and TEE/RMR were compared among the subgroups. Body weight and RMR together accounted for 66% of the variation in TEE for the European group but only 17% for the Polynesian group.

Conclusion: Care should be taken in applying "Caucasian norms" relating to energy expenditure to NZ Polynesian people.

Key Words: Doubly labeled water • indirect calorimetry • obesity • ethnicity • resting metabolic rate • total energy expenditure • activity energy expenditure • fat mass • New Zealand Polynesians • New Zealand Europeans • women




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J J. Snodgrass, W. R Leonard, L. A Tarskaia, and D. A Schoeller
Total energy expenditure in the Yakut (Sakha) of Siberia as measured by the doubly labeled water method.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. K. Gordon, E. L. Ferguson, V. Toafa, T.-E. Henry, A. Goulding, A. M. Grant, and B. E. Guthrie
High Levels of Childhood Obesity Observed among 3- to 7-Year-Old New Zealand Pacific Children Is a Public Health Concern
J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3456 - 3460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. A. Schoeller
Recent Advances from Application of Doubly Labeled Water to Measurement of Human Energy Expenditure
J. Nutr., October 1, 1999; 129(10): 1765 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition