| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research Communications |
Background:Accurate measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) is helpful in determining the energy needs of critically ill patients requiring nutritional support. Currently, the most accurate clinical tool used to measure REE is indirect calorimetry, which is expensive, requires trained personnel, and has significant error at higher inspired oxygen concentrations.
Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare REE measured by indirect calorimetry with REE calculated by using the Fick method and prediction equations by Harris-Benedict, Ireton-Jones, Fusco, and Frankenfield.
Design:REEs of 36 patients [12 men and 24 women, mean age 58 ± 22 y and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 22 ± 8] in a hospital intensive care unit and receiving mechanical ventilation and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were measured for 
15 min by using indirect calorimetry and compared with REEs calculated from a mean of 2 sets of hemodynamic measurements taken during the metabolic testing period with an oximetric pulmonary artery catheter.
Results:Mean REE by indirect calorimetry was 8381 ± 1940 kJ/d and correlated poorly with the other methods tested (r2 = 0.057–0.154). This correlation did not improve after adjusting for changes in respiratory quotient (r2 = 0.28).
Conclusions: These data do not support previous findings showing a strong correlation between REE determined by the Fick method and other prediction equations and indirect calorimetry. In critically ill patients receiving TPN, indirect calorimetry, if available, remains the most appropriate clinical tool for accurate measurement of REE.
Key Words: Energy expenditure • critical illness • indirect calorimetry • Fick equation • Harris-Benedict equation • Ireton-Jones equation • Frankenfield equation • total parenteral nutrition
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. A. Haugen, L.-N. Chan, and F. Li Indirect Calorimetry: A Practical Guide for Clinicians Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 377 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Zijlstra, S. M. t. Dam, P. J. M. Hulshof, C. Ram, G. Hiemstra, and N. M. de Roos 24-Hour Indirect Calorimetry in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Frankenfield Energy Expenditure and Protein Requirements After Traumatic Injury Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Rubenbauer, D. L. Johannsen, S. M. Baier, R. Litchfield, and P. J. Flakoll The Use of a Handheld Calorimetry Unit to Estimate Energy Expenditure During Different Physiological Conditions JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2006; 30(3): 246 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Higgins, B. J. Daly, A. R. Lipson, and S.-E. Guo Assessing Nutritional Status in Chronically Critically Ill Adult Patients Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2006; 15(2): 166 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. O'Leary-Kelley, K. A. Puntillo, J. Barr, N. Stotts, and M. K. Douglas Nutritional Adequacy in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Who Are Fed Enterally Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2005; 14(3): 222 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. G. Campbell, E. Zander, and W. Thorland Predicted vs Measured Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill, Underweight Patients Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 276 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Holdy Monitoring Energy Metabolism with Indirect Calorimetry: Instruments, Interpretation, and Clinical Application Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 447 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
