AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Utter, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Butterworth, D. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Utter, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Butterworth, D. E
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Utter, A. C
Right arrow Articles by Butterworth, D. E
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 4, 603-607, April 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Use of the leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance method in assessing body-composition change in obese women1,2,3

Alan C Utter, David C Nieman, Angela N Ward and Diane E Butterworth

Background: There is little information on whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) accurately predicts changes in body composition associated with energy restriction, exercise, or both.

Objective: We had 2 objectives: to determine the validity of the leg-to-leg BIA system in 1) estimating body composition in obese and nonobese women, with a cross-sectional design, and 2) assessing changes in body composition in obese women in response to 12 wk of energy restriction, exercise training, or both.

Design: Subjects were 98 moderately obese women (43.2 ± 0.6% body fat, 45.0 ± 1.1 y of age) and 27 nonobese control subjects (24.0 ± 1.5% body fat, 43.5 ± 2.5 y of age). Obese subjects were randomly divided into 1 of 4 groups, with fat-free mass, fat mass, and percentage body fat estimated with BIA and underwater weighing before and after 12 wk of intervention. The 4 groups were diet only (4.19–5.44 MJ/d), exercise only (five, 45-min sessions/wk at 78.5 ± 0.5% of maximum heart rate), both exercise and diet, and control (no diet or exercise).

Results: No significant difference was found between underwater weighing and BIA in estimating the fat-free mass of the obese and nonobese women (all subjects combined, r = 0.78, P < 0.001, SEE = 3.7 kg) or in estimating decreases in fat mass during 12 wk of energy restriction, exercise, or both in obese subjects (F[3, 85] = 1.45, P = 0.233).

Conclusions: The leg-to-leg BIA system accurately assessed fat-free mass in obese and nonobese women, and changes in fat mass with diet alone or when combined with exercise.

Key Words: Body composition • exercise • energy restriction • body fat • underwater weighing • bioelectrical impedance • obesity • fat-free mass • percentage body fat • women




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G. E Krassas, N. Pontikides, K. Loustis, G. Koliakos, T. Constantinidis, and D. Panidis
Resistin levels in hyperthyroid patients before and after restoration of thyroid function: relationship with body weight and body composition
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 217 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. Derumeaux-Burel, M. Meyer, L. Morin, and Y. Boirie
Prediction of resting energy expenditure in a large population of obese children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1544 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
L. A. Powell, D. C. Nieman, C. Melby, K. Cureton, D. Schmidt, E. T. Howley, J. O. Hill, J. R. Mault, H. Alexander, and D. J. Stewart
Assessment of Body Composition Change in a Community-Based Weight Management Program
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 20(1): 26 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition