AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 4, 614-620, April 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

An independent, inverse association of high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol concentration with nonadipose body mass1,2,3

Angelo Pietrobelli, Robert C Lee, Esmeralda Capristo, Richard J Deckelbaum and Steven B Heymsfield

Background: Increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with progressively lower serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations, although the underlying body-composition compartment accounting for this unfavorable lipid change remains uncertain.

Objective: Because growing evidence favors a role of lean tissue in HDL homeostasis, the hypothesis was tested that non–adipose tissue components of body mass explain the inverse association of HDL cholesterol and BMI.

Design: Fasting serum lipid concentrations and body composition [total, subcutaneous, and visceral adipose tissue; adipose tissue–free mass (ATFM); and skeletal muscle by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and body cell mass by 40K counting) were evaluated in healthy adults. Body-composition compartments were expressed as height2-normalized indexes.

Results: An inverse correlation was observed between serum HDL cholesterol and BMI in women (n = 68; R2 = 0.08, P = 0.023) and men (n = 61; R2 = 0.07, P = 0.046). Significant inverse correlations (P = 0.005–0.02) were also observed between HDL cholesterol and nonadipose components (ie, ATFM, skeletal muscle, and body cell mass) but not between HDL cholesterol and any adipose tissue component. The association between HDL cholesterol and ATFM remained significant after serum triacylglycerol was controlled for. When BMI was entered into the HDL cholesterol–ATFM regression model, BMI was not a significant independent variable. The strongest correlate of serum triacylglycerol was visceral adipose tissue (P = 0.002 for both women and men).

Conclusions: Lean tissues and body cell mass appear to account in part for the long-observed inverse association of HDL cholesterol and BMI. These observations suggest a link between nonadipose tissue compartments and the greater cardiovascular risk associated with high BMI.

Key Words: HDL cholesterol • high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol • serum lipids • cardiovascular disease • body composition • skeletal muscle • adipose tissue • body mass index • magnetic resonance imaging







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition