AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Bouchard, C.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1123-1129, June 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Seven-year stability of indicators of obesity and adipose tissue distribution in the Canadian population1,2,3

Peter T Katzmarzyk, Louis Pérusse, Robert M Malina and Claude Bouchard

Background: The prevention of obesity appears to be a better approach than treatment; thus, the prediction of future obesity from current status is important.

Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the stability of adiposity and adipose tissue distribution (ATD) in the Canadian population.

Design: The sample included 1048 males and 1063 females aged 7–69 y at baseline from the Campbell's Survey, a 7-y follow-up of the Canada Fitness Survey. Indicators of adiposity included body mass index (BMI), sum of 5 skinfold thicknesses (SF5), and waist circumference (Waist), whereas indicators of ATD included the ratio of trunk to extremity skinfold thicknesses adjusted for SF5 (TERadj), and Waist adjusted for BMI (Waistadj).

Results: Interage correlations ranged from 0.53 to 0.91 for BMI, from -0.09 to 0.72 for SF5, from 0.24 to 0.89 for Waist, from 0.23 to 0.73 for TERadj, and from 0.18 to 0.77 for Waistadj. Correlations for BMI were higher than for SF5, suggesting that fat-free mass may contribute to the stability of BMI. Although lower than those for BMI, correlations for indicators of ATD were significant, indicating a propensity to retain an android or gynoid pattern. Furthermore, the average percentage of participants remaining in the lower or upper quintiles for the various indicators ranged from 37.8% to 66.7% in males and from 47.0% to 65.3% in females, indicating that those in the lower and upper portions of the distribution tend to remain there.

Conclusion: Obesity and ATD showed significant stability over 7 y in the Canadian population.

Key Words: Fatness • tracking • fat distribution • skinfold thicknesses • subcutaneous tissue • body mass index • Canada Fitness Survey • Campbell's Survey




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. W Peeters, G. P Beunen, H. H Maes, R. J. Loos, A. L Claessens, R. Vlietinck, and M. A Thomis
Genetic and environmental determination of tracking in subcutaneous fat distribution during adolescence
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 652 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
G. Psarra, G. P. Nassis, and L. S. Sidossis
Short-term predictors of abdominal obesity in children
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 16(5): 520 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. W Taylor, I. E Jones, S. M Williams, and A. Goulding
Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3-19 y
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2000; 72(2): 490 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition