AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sempos, C. T
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, N. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sempos, C. T
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, N. D
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sempos, C. T
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, N. D
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1330S-1338S, June 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Supplements

Food and nutrient exposures: what to consider when evaluating epidemiologic evidence 1 ,2

Christopher T Sempos, Kiang Liu and Nancy D Ernst

Nutritional epidemiology is the science concerned with conducting research into the relation between diet and disease risk. The public has a great deal of interest in this issue. Much of that interest, however, is fueled by the publication of sensationalized, startling, and often contradictory health messages. Unfortunately, there is a great deal of confusion in both the scientific press and the public or lay press about the nature of nutritional epidemiology, its strengths, and its limitations. The purpose of this article is to discuss these strengths and limitations. It is hoped that clarification of these issues can help lead to a resolution of the research community's and lay public's misunderstandings about nutritional epidemiology research.

Key Words: Nutrition • epidemiology • cancer • coronary heart disease • coronary artery disease • diet • dietary survey methods • study design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Kavanaugh, P. R. Trumbo, and K. C. Ellwood
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Evidence-Based Review for Qualified Health Claims: Tomatoes, Lycopene, and Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 18, 2007; 99(14): 1074 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
W. Yang, T. Kelly, and J. He
Genetic Epidemiology of Obesity
Epidemiol. Rev., June 12, 2007; (2007) mxm004v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. R Trumbo and K. C Ellwood
Lutein and zeaxanthin intakes and risk of age-related macular degeneration and cataracts: an evaluation using the Food and Drug Administration's evidence-based review system for health claims.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 971 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
S L Jowett, C J Seal, M S Pearce, E Phillips, W Gregory, J R Barton, and M R Welfare
Influence of dietary factors on the clinical course of ulcerative colitis: a prospective cohort study
Gut, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 1479 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
U. Palaniappan, R. I. Cue, H. Payette, and K. Gray-Donald
Implications of Day-to-Day Variability on Measurements of Usual Food and Nutrient Intakes
J. Nutr., January 1, 2003; 133(1): 232 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. Byers, B. Lyle, and W. Participants
Summary statement
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69 (6): 1365S - 1367S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition