AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malina, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malina, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Malina, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Katzmarzyk, P. T
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 1, 131S-136S, July 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Supplements

Validity of the body mass index as an indicator of the risk and presence of overweight in adolescents1,2

Robert M Malina and Peter T Katzmarzyk

1 From the Institute for the Study of Youth Sports, Michigan State University, East Lansing, and the Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, North York, Canada.

The validity of the body mass index (BMI) as an indicator of the risk of becoming overweight and of the presence of overweight was evaluated in 6 groups of adolescents comprising several ethnic groups (n = 1570, aged 9–19 y). With use of triceps skinfold thickness and estimated percentage body fat as the criteria for adiposity, BMI had high specificities (86.1–98.8% for risk of overweight and 96.3–100% for presence of overweight) and lower but variable sensitivities (4.3–75.0% for risk of overweight and 14.3–60% for presence of overweight). Thus, almost all adolescents who were not at risk for overweight or who were not overweight were classified correctly. In contrast, many adolescents who were at risk of overweight or who were overweight were not correctly identified as measured by BMI. Partial correlations, controlling for age, between BMI and the triceps skinfold thickness and estimated percentage body fat were generally moderate to moderately high, whereas BMI and triceps skinfold thickness appeared to be equally related to estimated total body fatness and percentage body fat in Mexican American and Austrian white males. BMI was better correlated with trunk skinfold thicknesses, but when relative subcutaneous fat distribu-tion was statistically controlled, the trunk-extremity contrast in the correlations was no longer apparent.

Key Words: Risk factors • body composition • overweight • puberty • obesity • anthropometry • body mass index • percentage body fat • adolescents




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Mustillo, C. Worthman, A. Erkanli, G. Keeler, A. Angold, and E. J. Costello
Obesity and Psychiatric Disorder: Developmental Trajectories
Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): 851 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. C Bellizzi and W. H Dietz
Workshop on childhood obesity: summary of the discussion
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 1999; 70 (1): 173S - 175S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition