AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 1, 157S-162S, July 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Supplements

Comparison of weight and height relations in boys from 4 countries1,2

MF Franklin

1, Undertaken on behalf of the International Obesity Task Force working group on childhood obesity.

Height and weight data from children in the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Singapore were analyzed to investigate differences in growth between the groups of children. An investigation into the adjusted weight indexes of the form index = weight/heightp for differing powers of p (Benn index) showed that the power of p required to produce a correlation of zero between the index and height varied with age. For the United States, Japan, and Singapore the p value was just below 3.0 for children aged 6 y, increased to {approx}3.5 for children aged {approx}10 y, and decreased to {approx}2.0 at age {approx}18 y. A consequence of the p value being mostly >2.0 is that BMI (wt/ht2) tends to be greater for tall children than for short children. The US data (from the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) also contained information on skinfold thickness. Relating skinfold thickness to indexes of the same form for height and weight suggested that the best relation was achieved with p values of {approx}2.0 except for children aged 12–16 y, for whom the optimal values for p were higher. The highest value, 2.9, was achieved at ages 12–13 y. Overall, the use of BMI as an indicator of adiposity appears acceptable for children aged 6–7 and 17–18 y. However, BMI should be used with caution when assessing children aged 8–16 y.

Key Words: BMI • weight • height • obesity • children • Benn index • United States • United Kingdom • Japan • Singapore




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
E. W. Demerath, C. M. Schubert, L. M. Maynard, S. S. Sun, W. C. Chumlea, A. Pickoff, S. A. Czerwinski, B. Towne, and R. M. Siervogel
Do Changes in Body Mass Index Percentile Reflect Changes in Body Composition in Children? Data From the Fels Longitudinal Study
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): e487 - e495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. C Bellizzi and W. H Dietz
Workshop on childhood obesity: summary of the discussion
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 1999; 70 (1): 173S - 175S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition