AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, D. L
Right arrow Articles by Spurr, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, D. L
Right arrow Articles by Spurr, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, D. L
Right arrow Articles by Spurr, G.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 2, 269-276, August 1999
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Energy intake and expenditure of free-living, pregnant Colombian women in an urban setting1,2,3

Darna L Dufour, Julio C Reina and GB Spurr

1 From the Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder; the Departments of Physiological Sciences and Pediatrics, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia; and the Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin and the Research Service, Zablocki Veterans Administration Center, Milwaukee.

Background: This study examined the components of energy balance in poor, free-living pregnant women living in an urban setting of a developing country.

Objectives: We tested the following hypotheses: 1) energy intake increases in pregnancy and is greater than when nonpregnant and nonlactating (NPNL), 2) basal metabolic rate (BMR) increases in pregnancy and the increase is positively correlated with prepregnancy fatness, and 3) energy expenditure in activity decreases in pregnancy and is lower than in NPNL women.

Design: Pregnant women were studied at 14.8 ± 3.4 (n = 40), 25.0 ± 3.2 (n = 54), and 34.9 ± 2.4 (n = 43) wk gestation, and NPNL women at baseline (n = 114) and at 3 (n = 103) and 6 (n = 93) mo. Energy intake was measured by using estimated diet records and energy expenditure by using the flex heart rate method. Time allocation in physical activity was assessed by observation.

Results: In pregnant women, body weight, BMR, and energy intake increased but total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) did not change significantly. There were no significant changes in time allocation to selected activities except for lying down. In comparison with NPNL control subjects, women in late pregnancy had higher energy intakes and BMRs. Values for TDEE were not significantly different, but pregnant women expended less energy in activity and allocated more time to 2 energy-saving activities and less time to 2 energy-demanding activities.

Conclusion: A decrease in energy expenditure in activity and changes in time allocation are important ways in which pregnant women meet the energy demands of pregnancy.

Key Words: Energy intake • energy expenditure • diet • nutrition • developing country • pregnancy • urban setting • heart rate • activity • time allocation • poverty • basal metabolic rate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. A Kim, K. M Yount, U. Ramakrishnan, and R. Martorell
The relationship between parity and overweight varies with household wealth and national development
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 36(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Nutrition