| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Original Research Communications |
1 From the Exercise and Health Unit, Exercise and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Human Movement, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal, and the Department of Physiology, Body Composition Research Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Background: Valid and practical methods based on health-related criteria for obesity screening in children and adolescents are not available. Arbitrarily defined body mass index (BMI) cutoffs have been proposed to select adolescents at high risk of developing obesity in adulthood.
Objective: We assessed the usefulness of BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, and upper arm girth for screening for obesity by using a health-related definition of obesity (
25% body fat in boys and 30% body fat in girls) and a criterion method (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) that estimates percentage fat without the potential bias associated with other methods in adolescents.
Design: This was a cross-sectional study of Portuguese boys (n = 165) and girls (n = 163) aged 10–15 y. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to define the best tradeoff between true-positive and false-positive rates.
Results: True-positive rates ranged from 67% to 87% and from 50% to 100% in girls and boys, respectively, and false-positive rates ranged from 0% to 19% and from 5% to 26%, respectively. For children aged 10–11 y, the areas under the curves (AUCs) for ROCs, an index of diagnostic accuracy, were close to 1.0, suggesting very good accuracy. For older boys and girls, AUCs for triceps skinfold thickness were similar to or greater than AUCs for BMI and upper arm girth.
Conclusions: The results suggest that triceps skinfold thickness gives the best results for obesity screening in adolescents aged 10–15 y. BMI and upper arm girth were reasonable alternatives, except in 14–15-y-old boys, in whom both indexes were only marginally able to discriminate obesity.
Key Words: Obesity • receiver operating characteristic curve • ROC curve • dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry • DXA • anthropometry • body mass index • BMI • triceps skinfold thickness • arm girth • screening • children • adolescents
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. E. Barlow and and the Expert Committee Expert Committee Recommendations Regarding the Prevention, Assessment, and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity: Summary Report Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(Supplement_4): S164 - S192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. F. Krebs, J. H. Himes, D. Jacobson, T. A. Nicklas, P. Guilday, and D. Styne Assessment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(Supplement_4): S193 - S228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. C. Nooyens, L. L. Koppes, T. L. Visscher, J. W. Twisk, H. C. Kemper, A J. Schuit, W. van Mechelen, and J. C Seidell Adolescent skinfold thickness is a better predictor of high body fatness in adults than is body mass index: the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Moreno, M. G. Blay, G. Rodriguez, V. A. Blay, M. I. Mesana, J. L. Olivares, J. Fleta, A. Sarria, M. Bueno, and AVENA-Zaragoza Study Group Screening performances of the international obesity task force body mass index cut-off values in adolescents. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 25(5): 403 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness and Council Active Healthy Living: Prevention of Childhood Obesity Through Increased Physical Activity Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): 1834 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. W. Speiser, M. C. J. Rudolf, H. Anhalt, C. Camacho-Hubner, F. Chiarelli, A. Eliakim, M. Freemark, A. Gruters, E. Hershkovitz, L. Iughetti, et al. Childhood Obesity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1871 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. G Neovius, Y. M Linne, B. S Barkeling, and S. O Rossner Sensitivity and specificity of classification systems for fatness in adolescents Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2004; 80(3): 597 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Willms Early childhood obesity: a call for early surveillance and preventive measures Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 3, 2004; 171(3): 243 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B Zimmermann, C. Gubeli, C. Puntener, and L. Molinari Detection of overweight and obesity in a national sample of 6-12-y-old Swiss children: accuracy and validity of reference values for body mass index from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the International Obesity Task Force Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 838 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W Taylor, I. E Jones, S. M Williams, and A. Goulding Body fat percentages measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry corresponding to recently recommended body mass index cutoffs for overweight and obesity in children and adolescents aged 3-18 y Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1416 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A R Dorosty, F Siassi, J J Reilly, R J Rona, and S Chinn Obesity in Iranian children Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2002; 87(5): 388 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
