AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 71, No. 3, 822-828, March 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Randomized diet in the neonatal period and growth performance until 7.5–8 y of age in preterm children1,2,3

Ruth Morley and Alan Lucas

1 From MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London; the Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; and the Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics.

Background: Preterm children are at high risk of poor growth performance. In 2 randomized trials, preterm infants fed preterm formula grew better in the neonatal period than those fed banked donor breast milk or standard term formula.

Objective: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that for preterm infants, the neonatal period is a critical one for programming growth performance and that early diet influences long-term growth.

Design: A total of 926 preterm infants were recruited into 2 parallel, randomized trials of neonatal diet. In trial 1, infants were fed either banked donor breast milk or preterm formula whereas in trial 2, infants were fed either standard term formula or preterm formula. Within each trial, the allocated milk was the sole diet for some infants (study A), whereas for others it was a supplement to maternal breast milk, given when not enough expressed breast milk was available (study B). We followed up 781 of 833 survivors (94%) to age 7.5–8 y. Trained assessors obtained anthropometric measurements according to a standard protocol.

Results: Despite significantly better neonatal growth performance in infants fed preterm formula (compared with either banked donor breast milk or standard formula), early diet had no influence on weight, height, head circumference, or skinfold thicknesses at 9 or 18 mo postterm or at age 7.5–8 y.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the preterm period is not a critical window for nutritional programming of growth, which contrasts with evidence from these trials showing that early diet influences later neurodevelopment.

Key Words: Preterm infants • premature infants • infant nutrition • milk • human milk • breast milk • infant growth • growth • infant feeding • neonatal diet • preterm formula • term formula • standard infant formula




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A. F Williams, C. C Kingdon, and G. Weaver
Banking for the future: investing in human milk
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2007; 92(3): F158 - F159.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C. A Boyd, M. A Quigley, and P. Brocklehurst
Donor breast milk versus infant formula for preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2007; 92(3): F169 - F175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Singhal, T. J. Cole, M. Fewtrell, K. Kennedy, T. Stephenson, A. Elias-Jones, and A. Lucas
Promotion of Faster Weight Gain in Infants Born Small for Gestational Age: Is There an Adverse Effect on Later Blood Pressure?
Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 213 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. L. Patel, J. L. Engstrom, P. P. Meier, and R. E. Kimura
Accuracy of Methods for Calculating Postnatal Growth Velocity for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1466 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Kinra, J H Baumer, and G Davey Smith
Early growth and childhood obesity: a historical cohort study
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 1122 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. J. Schanler, C. Lau, N. M. Hurst, and E. O. Smith
Randomized Trial of Donor Human Milk Versus Preterm Formula as Substitutes for Mothers' Own Milk in the Feeding of Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 400 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
W. McGuire, G. Henderson, and P. W Fowlie
Feeding the preterm infant
BMJ, November 20, 2004; 329(7476): 1227 - 1230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. S Fewtrell, A. Lucas, T. J Cole, and J. C. Wells
Prematurity and reduced body fatness at 8-12 y of age
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 436 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Singhal, I S. Farooqi, S. O'Rahilly, T. J Cole, M. Fewtrell, and A. Lucas
Early nutrition and leptin concentrations in later life
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2002; 75(6): 993 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A. F WILLIAMS
Early enteral feeding of the preterm infant
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2000; 83(3): 219F - 220.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Nutrition