AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jugdaohsingh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jugdaohsingh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jugdaohsingh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, J. J
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 71, No. 4, 944-949, April 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Oligomeric but not monomeric silica prevents aluminum absorption in humans1,2,3

Ravin Jugdaohsingh, David M Reffitt, Claire Oldham, J Phillip Day, L Keith Fifield, Richard PH Thompson and Jonathan J Powell

1 From the Gastrointestinal Laboratory, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London; the Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; and the Department of Nuclear Physics, Australian National University, Canberra.

Background: Soluble silica, a ubiquitous component of the diet, may be the natural ligand for dietary aluminum and may prevent its accumulation and toxicity in animals. However, previous studies on the inhibition of aluminum absorption and toxicity by soluble silica have produced conflicting results. We recently identified a soluble silica polymer, oligomeric silica, that has a much higher affinity for aluminum than does monomeric silica and that may be involved in the sequestration of aluminum.

Objective: By using 26Al as a tracer, we investigated the effects of oligomeric and monomeric silica on the bioavailability of aluminum (study 1) and compared the availability of silicon from oligomeric and monomeric silica in the human gastrointestinal tract (study 2).

Design: In study 1, three healthy volunteers each ingested aluminum alone (control), aluminum with oligomeric silica (17 mg), and aluminum with monomeric silica (17 mg). In study 2, five healthy volunteers ingested both the oligomeric and monomeric forms of silica (34 mg). Serum and urine samples were analyzed for aluminum and silicon.

Results: Oligomeric silica reduced the availability of aluminum by 67% (P = 0.01) compared with the control, whereas monomeric silica had no effect (P = 0.40). Monomeric silica was readily taken up from the gastrointestinal tract and then excreted in urine (53%), whereas oligomeric silica was not detectably absorbed or excreted.

Conclusions: The oligomeric, high-aluminum-affinity form of soluble silica reduces aluminum availability from the human gastrointestinal tract. Its potential role in the amelioration of aluminum toxicity in other biological systems requires attention.

Key Words: Oligomeric silica • monomeric silica • orthosilicic acid • silicon • silicic acid • silica • aluminum • absorption • bioavailability • gastrointestinal uptake • accelerator mass spectrometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
F. J. DOS SANTOS, O. S. SIQUEIRA, A. A. S. T. DELBEN, J. R. J. DELBEN, and P. MELNIKOV
Spongolite: a hollow fibrous mineral from Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil
Clay Minerals, June 1, 2002; 37(2): 249 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Desouky, R. Jugdaohsingh, C. R. McCrohan, K. N. White, and J. J. Powell
Aluminum-dependent regulation of intracellular silicon in the aquatic invertebrate Lymnaea stagnalis
PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3394 - 3399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Nutrition