AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hediger, M. L
Right arrow Articles by Troendle, J. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hediger, M. L
Right arrow Articles by Troendle, J. F
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hediger, M. L
Right arrow Articles by Troendle, J. F
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 72, No. 1, 159-167, July 2000
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communications

Early infant feeding and growth status of US-born infants and children aged 4–71 mo: analyses from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–19941,2

Mary L Hediger, Mary D Overpeck, W June Ruan and James F Troendle

1 From the Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Background: There is controversy over what growth references to use in evaluating breast-fed infants and concern about whether never-breast-fed infants are at risk of overweight in childhood.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether infants who are exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo differ in average size from infants who are fed in other ways and whether such differences persist through age 5 y.

Design: Data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) were linked to birth certificates of US-born infants and children. Feeding groups were defined on the basis of feeding patterns over the first 4 mo of life: exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo, partially breast-fed, breast-fed for <4 mo, and never breast-fed. Growth status, indexed as internally derived z scores (SD units) for weight, length (height), weight-for-length (height), midupper arm circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness, was compared among feeding groups.

Results: The final sample consisted of 5594 non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Mexican American infants and children aged 4–71 mo. Of these, 21% were exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo, 10% were partially breast-fed, 24% were breast-fed for <4 mo, and 45% were never breast-fed. At 8–11 mo, infants who were exclusively breast-fed for4 mo had adjusted mean z scores for weight (-0.21; -0.2 kg), weight-for-length (-0.27), and midupper arm circumference (-0.15) that differed significantly from zero (P < 0.05). By 12–23 mo, the differences had dissipated; there were no significant differences subsequent to 5 y. Triceps skinfold thickness was not related to early infant feeding.

Conclusion: Infants who were exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo weighed less at 8–11 mo than did infants who were fed in other ways, but there were few other significant differences in growth status through age 5 y associated with early infant feeding.

Key Words: Breast-feeding • growth • infants • young children • weight • length • midupper arm circumference • triceps skinfold thickness • third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey • NHANES III




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. G. Woo, L. M. Dolan, A. L. Morrow, S. R. Geraghty, and E. Goodman
Breastfeeding Helps Explain Racial and Socioeconomic Status Disparities in Adolescent Adiposity
Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e458 - e465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
M. F. McCann, N. Baydar, and R. L. Williams
Breastfeeding Attitudes and Reported Problems in a National Sample of WIC Participants
J Hum Lact, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 314 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Scholtens, U. Gehring, B. Brunekreef, H. A. Smit, J. C. de Jongste, M. Kerkhof, J. Gerritsen, and A. H. Wijga
Breastfeeding, Weight Gain in Infancy, and Overweight at Seven Years of Age: The Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy Birth Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2007; 165(8): 919 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. de Onis, C. Garza, A. W. Onyango, and E. Borghi
Comparison of the WHO Child Growth Standards and the CDC 2000 Growth Charts
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 144 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Ryan and W. Zhou
Lower Breastfeeding Rates Persist Among the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Participants, 1978-2003
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1136 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. L Baker, K. F Michaelsen, K. M Rasmussen, and T. I. Sorensen
Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1579 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
K. Bonuck, R. Kahn, and C. Schechter
Is Late Bottle-Weaning Associated with Overweight in Young Children? Analysis of NHANES III Data
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 43(6): 535 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Ryan, R. Li, and L. Grummer-Strawn
The Truth About the Ross Mothers Survey
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 626 - 627.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. S Kramer, T. Guo, R. W Platt, Z. Sevkovskaya, I. Dzikovich, J.-P. Collet, S. Shapiro, B. Chalmers, E. Hodnett, I. Vanilovich, et al.
Infant growth and health outcomes associated with 3 compared with 6 mo of exclusive breastfeeding
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2003; 78(2): 291 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. S. Sothern and S. T. Gordon
Prevention of Obesity in Young Children: A Critical Challenge for Medical Professionals
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 42(2): 101 - 111.
[PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. S. Ryan, Z. Wenjun, and A. Acosta
Breastfeeding Continues to Increase Into the New Millennium
Pediatrics, December 1, 2002; 110(6): 1103 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. S. Kramer, T. Guo, R. W. Platt, S. Shapiro, J.-P. Collet, B. Chalmers, E. Hodnett, Z. Sevkovskaya, I. Dzikovich, and I. Vanilovich
Breastfeeding and Infant Growth: Biology or Bias?
Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. L. Eckhardt, J. Rivera, L. S. Adair, and R. Martorell
Full Breast-Feeding for at Least Four Months Has Differential Effects on Growth before and after Six Months of Age among Children in a Mexican Community
J. Nutr., September 1, 2001; 131(9): 2304 - 2309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. L. Hediger, M. D. Overpeck, R. J. Kuczmarski, and W. J. Ruan
Association Between Infant Breastfeeding and Overweight in Young Children
JAMA, May 16, 2001; 285(19): 2453 - 2460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Nutrition