|
|
||||||||
Original Research Communication |
1 From the Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, and the Department of Medicine, Divisions of Cardiology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.
Background: Indirect measures of body composition suggest that Hispanic women have an excess prevalence of overweight and obesity compared with white women. Socioeconomic status (SES) is a potentially confounding factor in such studies.
Objective: Our aim was to determine whether Hispanic ethnicity is associated with higher total and regional adiposity and lower fat-free mass (FFM) in healthy women across the adult age range.
Design: We used a prospective cross-sectional design to examine total and regional body composition in 54 Hispanic women (primarily of Mexican descent) and 56 white women of similar SES.
Results: The groups were not significantly different in mean age, body mass, or SES, although the Hispanic women were shorter (P < 0.05). Body mass index (in kg/m2; 25.2 ± 0.5 compared with 23.9 ± 0.5; P < 0.05), percentage body fat (38.4 ± 0.8% compared with 34.9 ± 1.3%; P < 0.05), and total fat mass (25.0 ± 1.0 compared with 23.0 ± 1.2 kg; P = 0.10) were or tended to be higher in the Hispanic women. The greater total adiposity of the Hispanic women was primarily the result of higher percentage fat and fat mass in the trunk (P < 0.05); within the trunk region, abdominal and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were 3040% greater in the Hispanic women (P < 0.01). Total FFM was slightly but significantly lower in the Hispanic women (38.9 ± 0.6 compared with 40.9 ± 0.6 kg; P = 0.01), primarily because of a smaller FFM in the trunk region (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Among healthy women, Hispanic (Mexican American) ethnicity may be associated with modestly higher levels of adiposity and slightly lower amounts of FFM overall and in the trunk region in particular.
Key Words: Adiposity body fat fat-free mass Mexican Americans women body composition socioeconomic status ethnicity
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. R. Wilson and D. D. McAlpine The Effectiveness of Screening for Obesity in Primary Care: Weighing the Evidence Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2006; 63(5): 570 - 598. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ramirez-Zea, B. Torun, R. Martorell, and A. D Stein Anthropometric predictors of body fat as measured by hydrostatic weighing in Guatemalan adults. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 795 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. McTigue, R. Harris, B. Hemphill, L. Lux, S. Sutton, A. J. Bunton, and K. N. Lohr Screening and Interventions for Obesity in Adults: Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 933 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Fernandez, M. Heo, S. B Heymsfield, R. N Pierson Jr, F X. Pi-Sunyer, Z. M Wang, J. Wang, M. Hayes, D. B Allison, and D. Gallagher Is percentage body fat differentially related to body mass index in Hispanic Americans, African Americans, and European Americans? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 71 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B Forbes On the matter of ethnic differences in body composition Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2001; 74(4): 555 - 555. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |