AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by de Roos, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Katan, M. B
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 73, No. 1, 75-79, January 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Original Research Communication

Serum lithium as a compliance marker for food and supplement intake1,2,3

Nicole M de Roos, Jeanne HM de Vries and Martijn B Katan

1 From the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Background: Analyzing 24-h urine for lithium after consumption of lithium-tagged foods or supplements provides a validated compliance marker but is laborious.

Objective: Most studies involve blood sampling; therefore, we tested whether serum lithium concentration could be used as a compliance marker.

Design: We used serum lithium as a compliance marker in a dietary trial and an evaluation study.

Results: In the dietary trial, 78 volunteers consumed 500 mL yogurt tagged with lithium (250 µmol/d) for 6 wk. Serum lithium increased from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 6.6 ± 1.5 µmol/L, which was close to the predicted concentration, indicating that the subjects were highly compliant. However, the interindividual variability in serum lithium concentration was large. To test whether this variability resulted from compliance differences or natural variability, we performed an evaluation study: 12 subjects took a lithium supplement (250 µmol/d) for 13 d under supervision. Serum lithium increased from 0.14 ± 0.03 to 3.9 ± 0.8 µmol/L (range: 2.6–5.4 µmol/L); thus, there was wide interindividual variation in serum lithium despite 100% compliance. However, within-subject variability was small, with a CV of 7% for serum lithium measured on 4 different days. We checked whether taking half the dose on each of 2 d (125 µmol lithium/d) would significantly lower serum lithium. Indeed, serum lithium dropped in all subjects, by a mean of 1.0 µmol/L on the first day (P < 0.0001) and by another 0.3 µmol/L on the second day (P = 0.0004). Thus, changes in serum lithium concentration of >=1.0 µmol/L suggest altered compliance.

Conclusion: Serum lithium concentrations after intake of lithum-tagged foods or supplements can be used to assess compliance in dietary trials.

Key Words: Lithium • compliance marker • dietary trials • compliance • noncompliance • nutrition research • dietary intervention • diet studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
W. T. Donahoo, D. H. Bessesen, D. R. Higbee, S. Lei, G. K. Grunwald, and J. A. Higgins
Serum Lithium Concentration Can Be Used to Assess Dietary Compliance in Adults1
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3133 - 3136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
G. N. Schrauzer
Lithium: Occurrence, Dietary Intakes, Nutritional Essentiality
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2002; 21(1): 14 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Nutrition