|
|
||||||||
Supplement |
1 From the Department of Biochemistry, Rush Medical College, Chicago.
Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli are purportedly beneficial to human health and are called probiotics. Their survival during passage through the human gut, when administered in fermented milk products, has been investigated intensely in recent years. Well-controlled, small-scale studies on diarrhea in both adults and infants have shown that probiotics are beneficial and that they survive in sufficient numbers to affect gut microbial metabolism. Survival rates have been estimated at 2040% for selected strains, the main obstacles to survival being gastric acidity and the action of bile salts. Although it is believed that the maximum probiotic effect can be achieved if the organisms adhere to intestinal mucosal cells, there is no evidence that exogenously administered probiotics do adhere to the mucosal cells. Instead, they seem to pass into the feces without having adhered or multiplied. Thus, to obtain a continuous exogenous probiotic effect, the probiotic culture must be ingested continually. Certain exogenously administered substances enhance the action of both exogenous and endogenous probiotics. Human milk contains many substances that stimulate the growth of bifidobacteria in vitro and also in the small intestine of infants; however, it is unlikely that they function in the colon. However, lactulose and certain fructose-containing compounds, called prebiotics, are not digested in the small intestine but pass into the cecum unchanged, where they are selectively utilized by probiotics. Beneficial effects may thus accrue from exogenously administered probiotics, often administered with prebiotics, or by endogenous bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, whose metabolic activity and growth may also be enhanced by the administration of prebiotics.
Key Words: Probiotics prebiotics bifidobacteria lactobacilli intestinal tract diarrhea
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lebeer, J. Vanderleyden, and S. C. J. De Keersmaecker Genes and Molecules of Lactobacilli Supporting Probiotic Action Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 72(4): 728 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lebeer, I. J. J. Claes, T. L. A. Verhoeven, C. Shen, I. Lambrichts, J. L. Ceuppens, J. Vanderleyden, and S. C. J. De Keersmaecker Impact of luxS and Suppressor Mutations on the Gastrointestinal Transit of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 74(15): 4711 - 4718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Elli, M. L. Callegari, S. Ferrari, E. Bessi, D. Cattivelli, S. Soldi, L. Morelli, N. Goupil Feuillerat, and J.-M. Antoine Survival of yogurt bacteria in the human gut. Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2006; 72(7): 5113 - 5117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yuan, L. Zhu, X. Liu, T. Li, Y. Zhang, T. Ying, B. Wang, J. Wang, H. Dong, E. Feng, et al. A Proteome Reference Map and Proteomic Analysis of Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705 Mol. Cell. Proteomics, June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1105 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ruas-Madiedo, A. Hernandez-Barranco, A. Margolles, and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilan A Bile Salt-Resistant Derivative of Bifidobacterium animalis Has an Altered Fermentation Pattern When Grown on Glucose and Maltose Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2005; 71(11): 6564 - 6570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Langlands, M J Hopkins, N Coleman, and J H Cummings Prebiotic carbohydrates modify the mucosa associated microflora of the human large bowel Gut, November 1, 2004; 53(11): 1610 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. K. Lee, P. S. Ho, C. S. Low, H. Arvilommi, and S. Salminen Permanent Colonization by Lactobacillus casei Is Hindered by the Low Rate of Cell Division in Mouse Gut Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2004; 70(2): 670 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Duncan, A. J. Richardson, P. Kaul, R. P. Holmes, M. J. Allison, and C. S. Stewart Oxalobacter formigenes and Its Potential Role in Human Health Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2002; 68(8): 3841 - 3847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |