AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wollowski, I.
Right arrow Articles by Pool-Zobel, B. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wollowski, I.
Right arrow Articles by Pool-Zobel, B. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wollowski, I.
Right arrow Articles by Pool-Zobel, B. L
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 73, No. 2, 451S-455s, February 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Supplement

Protective role of probiotics and prebiotics in colon cancer1,2,3

Ingrid Wollowski, Gerhard Rechkemmer and Beatrice L Pool-Zobel

1 From the Institute for Nutritional Physiology, Federal Research Centre for Nutrition, Karlsruhe, Germany, and the Department of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacogenetics, Institute for Nutrition and Environment, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany.

Ingestion of viable probiotics or prebiotics is associated with anticarcinogenic effects, one mechanism of which is the detoxification of genotoxins in the gut. This mechanism was shown experimentally in animals with use of the rat colon carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and by determining endpoints that range from tumorigenesis to induction of DNA damage. Because of the complexity of cancer initiation, cancer progression, and the exposure of cancer in the gut, many types of interactions may be envisaged. Notably, some of our newer studies showed that short-lived metabolite mixtures isolated from milk that was fermented with strains of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus are more effective in deactivating etiologic risk factors of colon carcinogenesis than are cellular components of microorganisms. Ingestion of prebiotics results in a different spectrum of fermentation products, including the production of high concentrations of short-chain fatty acids. Gut flora, especially after the ingestion of resistant starch, induces the chemopreventive enzyme glutathione transferase {pi} in the colon of the rat. Together, these factors lead to a reduced load of genotoxic agents in the gut and to an increased production of agents that deactivate toxic components. Butyrate is one such protective agent and is associated with lowering cancer risk. It was recently shown that buytrate may inhibit the genotoxic activity of nitrosamides and hydrogen peroxide in human colon cells. In humans, the ingestion of probiotics leads to the excretion of urine with low concentrations of components that are genotoxic in human colon cells and high concentrations of components that induce oxidized DNA bases.

Key Words: Probiotics • prebiotics • lactic acid bacteria • microflora • colon cancer • protective mechanisms • antigenotoxicity • fermentation • short-chain fatty acids • butyrate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
V. Van Craeyveld, K. Swennen, E. Dornez, T. Van de Wiele, M. Marzorati, W. Verstraete, Y. Delaedt, O. Onagbesan, E. Decuypere, J. Buyse, et al.
Structurally Different Wheat-Derived Arabinoxylooligosaccharides Have Different Prebiotic and Fermentation Properties in Rats
J. Nutr., December 1, 2008; 138(12): 2348 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Blaut and T. Clavel
Metabolic Diversity of the Intestinal Microbiota: Implications for Health and Disease
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 751S - 755S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
C. M. Galdeano and G. Perdigon
The Probiotic Bacterium Lactobacillus casei Induces Activation of the Gut Mucosal Immune System through Innate Immunity
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. K. Le Leu, I. L. Brown, Y. Hu, A. R. Bird, M. Jackson, A. Esterman, and G. P. Young
A Synbiotic Combination of Resistant Starch and Bifidobacterium lactis Facilitates Apoptotic Deletion of Carcinogen-Damaged Cells in Rat Colon
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 996 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Zsivkovits, K. Fekadu, G. Sontag, U. Nabinger, W. W. Huber, M. Kundi, A. Chakraborty, H. Foissy, and S. Knasmuller
Prevention of heterocyclic amine-induced DNA damage in colon and liver of rats by different lactobacillus strains
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2003; 24(12): 1913 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. P. Femia, C. Luceri, P. Dolara, A. Giannini, A. Biggeri, M. Salvadori, Y. Clune, K. J. Collins, M. Paglierani, and G. Caderni
Antitumorigenic activity of the prebiotic inulin enriched with oligofructose in combination with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1953 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. B Roberfroid
Prebiotics: preferential substrates for specific germs?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 406S - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. R Marteau, M. d. Vrese, C. J Cellier, and J. Schrezenmeir
Protection from gastrointestinal diseases with the use of probiotics
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 430S - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Nutrition