AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kärkkäinen, M. U.
Right arrow Articles by Välimäki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kärkkäinen, M. U.
Right arrow Articles by Välimäki, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kärkkäinen, M. U.
Right arrow Articles by Välimäki, M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 74, No. 3, 335-342, September 2001
© 2001 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Does it make a difference how and when you take your calcium? The acute effects of calcium on calcium and bone metabolism1,2

Merja UM Kärkkäinen, Christel JE Lamberg-Allardt, Suvi Ahonen and Matti Välimäki

1 From the Calcium Research Unit, the Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, and the Helsinki University Central Hospital.

Background: Calcium supplements are widely used to prevent osteoporosis. However, little is known about the metabolic effects of different dosages and of the timing of the dosages.

Objective: The aim was to study the effects of the timing of the dose (study 1), the effects of the size of the dose (study 2), and the effects of small repetitive doses (study 3) of calcium on calcium and bone metabolism in women.

Design: The investigation was conducted in 3 parts, each with 10 participants. In study 1, calcium loads (0 and 25 mg/kg body wt) were taken at 0900 and 2100. In study 2, calcium loads of 0, 250, and 1000 mg were taken at 0900. In study 3, calcium loads of 0 and 200 mg were taken 4 times/d. Markers of calcium and bone metabolism were followed.

Results: There was no significant difference in the response of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) to the calcium load taken at 0900 and that at 2100. There was a significant dose-response effect of the calcium load on serum ionized calcium (P = 0.00005) and serum PTH (P = 0.0003). Small calcium doses (200 mg) taken 4 times/d kept the PTH secrection at a lower level than during the control day (P = 0.016). None of the doses caused significant changes in the markers of bone formation and resorption measured.

Conclusions: The calcium loads had no significant effect on the markers of bone formation and resorption measured, although even small calcium doses decreased serum PTH and increased serum ionized calcium concentrations rapidly. The effect was similar whether calcium was taken in the morning or in the evening.

Key Words: Parathyroid hormone • calcium intake • bone metabolism • timing of supplementation • women




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
D. A. Straub
Calcium Supplementation in Clinical Practice: A Review of Forms, Doses, and Indications
Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2007; 22(3): 286 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Narva, M. Karkkainen, T. Poussa, C. Lamberg-Allardt, and R. Korpela
Caseinphosphopeptides in Milk and Fermented Milk Do Not Affect Calcium Metabolism Acutely in Postmenopausal Women
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2003; 22(1): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Nutrition