AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, W. W
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, K. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, W. W
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, K. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wong, W. W
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, K. J
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 76, No. 2, 384-389, August 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Evaluating body fat in girls and female adolescents: advantages and disadvantages of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry1,2,3,4

William W Wong, Albert C Hergenroeder, Janice E Stuff, Nancy F Butte, E O’Brian Smith and Kenneth J Ellis

1 From the US Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center and Texas Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

Background: Within the past 10 y, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has become one of the most widely used methods of measuring human body composition. However, DXA has not been fully evaluated against an independent criterion method of measuring body fatness in young females.

Objective: Our objective was to determine the bias and agreement between DXA and a 4-compartment model in predicting the percentage of fat mass (%FM) in a multiethnic group of young females.

Design: The %FM values measured by DXA of 73 white, 43 African American, 14 Hispanic, and 11 Asian females with a mean (± SD) age of 13.0 ± 1.9 y were compared with the 4-compartment values, which were based on measurements of body density, body water, and bone mineral content.

Results: The %FM values measured by the 2 methods were correlated at r = 0.90 with an SEE of 3.3%; Bland-Altman analysis indicated an average bias of 3.9%. After nullification of the average bias, an individual estimate of %FM by DXA could be underestimated or overestimated by 6.7% when compared with the 4-compartment value.

Conclusions: DXA is an appropriate method for estimating body composition in a group of young females because its bias and limits of agreement are independent of age, ethnicity, and body fatness. However, the limits of agreement of 6.7% could cause an individual FM value to be underestimated or overestimated by 28% relative to the 4-compartment value. Therefore, DXA may not be the optimal method of measuring the body fatness of young females.

Key Words: Body fat • percentage of fat mass • fat-free mass • girls • female adolescents • densitometry • isotope dilution • dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry • 4-compartment model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
V. K Haas, J. R Allen, M. R Kohn, S. D Clarke, S. Zhang, J. N Briody, M. Gruca, S. Madden, M. J Muller, and K. J Gaskin
Total body protein in healthy adolescent girls: validation of estimates derived from simpler measures with neutron activation analysis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 66 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
I. S Rogers, A. R Ness, C. D Steer, J. C. Wells, P. M Emmett, J. R Reilly, J. Tobias, and G. D. Smith
Associations of size at birth and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of lean and fat mass at 9 to 10 y of age.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 739 - 747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. E Williams, J. C. Wells, C. M Wilson, D. Haroun, A. Lucas, and M. S Fewtrell
Evaluation of Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in healthy persons and patients by comparison with the criterion 4-component model
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2006; 83(5): 1047 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. B. Sopher, J. C. Thornton, J. Wang, R. N. Pierson Jr, S. B. Heymsfield, and M. Horlick
Measurement of Percentage of Body Fat in 411 Children and Adolescents: A Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry With a Four-Compartment Model
Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5): 1285 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. J. Gately, D. Radley, C. B. Cooke, S. Carroll, B. Oldroyd, J. G. Truscott, W. A. Coward, and A. Wright
Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese children
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2039 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Nutrition