AJCN Cancer Health Disparities Conference
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seale, J. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seale, J. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seale, J. L
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 76, No. 3, 529-534, September 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Predicting total energy expenditure from self-reported dietary records and physical characteristics in adult and elderly men and women1,2

James L Seale

1 From the Diet and Human Performance Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD.

Background: Energy requirements and nutrient intakes are commonly estimated from self-reported dietary records, but such estimation has proven to be unreliable. When energy intakes determined from dietary records are compared with energy expenditures measured with the use of doubly labeled water, the former consistently underestimate energy requirements and have a high degree of variability.

Objective: The objective of this study was to reduce the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records through the use of stepwise multiple regression analysis to develop models that relate energy expenditure measured with the use of doubly labeled water to energy intake from dietary records, sex, and fat-free mass (or weight and height).

Design: Data from 54 healthy adult men and women were used to develop these models.

Results: Fat-free mass, energy intake, and sex accounted for 86% of the variability in energy expenditure, whereas energy intake, sex, height, and weight accounted for 83%. When the model relating fat-free mass, energy intake, and sex to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -17 ± 27% to 3 ± 16%. When the model relating energy intake, sex, weight, and height to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -19 ± 25% to -0.3 ± 19%.

Conclusion: Results from this study indicate that a simple relation can be used to correct self-reported dietary records to estimated energy requirements.

Key Words: Energy requirement • food intake • energy expenditure • doubly labeled water • dietary records • self-reporting bias




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. T. Kappagoda, D. A. Hyson, and E. A. Amsterdam
Low-carbohydrate-high-protein diets: Is there a place for them in clinical cardiology?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 725 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Nutrition